Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday January 20 2022, @12:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-affiliation-with-Monty-Python dept.

Radian announces plans to build one of the holy grails of spaceflight:

A Washington-state based aerospace company has exited stealth mode by announcing plans to develop one of the holy grails of spaceflight—a single-stage-to-orbit space plane. Radian Aerospace said it is deep into the design of an airplane-like vehicle that could take off from a runway, ignite its rocket engines, spend time in orbit, and then return to Earth and land on a runway.

"We all understand how difficult this is," said Livingston Holder, Radian's co-founder, chief technology officer, and former head of the Future Space Transportation and X-33 program at Boeing.

On Wednesday, Radian announced that it had recently closed a $27.5 million round of seed funding, led by Fine Structure Ventures. To date, Radian has raised about $32 million and has 18 full-time employees at its Renton, Washington, headquarters.

During an interview with Ars, Holder and Radian CEO Richard Humphrey explained that they realized it would require significantly more funding to build such an ambitious orbital space plane. Funding will pace their development efforts. For that reason, Humphrey said he was not comfortable putting a date on the company's first test flights but said that Radian was aiming to have an operational capability well before the end of the 2020s.

The current design of Radian One calls for taking up to five people and 5,000 pounds of cargo into orbit. The vehicle would have a down-mass capability of about 10,000 pounds and be powered by three liquid-fueled engines. The idea would be to get as close to airline operations as possible, by flying, landing, re-fueling, and flying again.

Since its founding in 2016, Radian has focused on the propulsion and structure of a vehicle that must withstand a variety of thermal and pressure environments. Humphrey said the company has built and tested its first "full-scale" engine. At full power, this cryogenic-fueled engine will have a thrust of about 200,000 pounds.

[...] There can be no question that this is a hugely challenging endeavor that many people have tried before. Will Radian find the right stuff, at the right moment in time? We'd like to think so.

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Thursday January 20 2022, @04:26PM (2 children)

    by mcgrew (701) <> on Thursday January 20 2022, @04:26PM (#1214207) Homepage Journal

    because they need two different fuel cycles, need to be reusable, and operate both in atmosphere and in vacuum

    One word: Hydrogen. It and LOX have sent many rockets to space, and I can see how it would be pretty trivial for a good engineer to design a jet engine that burned hydrogen.

    "Oh, but that could never work!" That's what they said about my zip code to state and city hack I came up with in the middle nineties and was using at work. A very few have finally started using it. But it could never work!

    I hope you're not an engineer.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @12:49AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @12:49AM (#1214405)

    For something that's pretty trivial, it's funny how no one has ever managed to do it. Here's a hint : there's more to it than just picking what kind of fuel to burn.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:13AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:13AM (#1214686)

    One word: No. Thrust to weight matters more than ISP when fighting drag, be it gravity or atmospheric, and thrust to cross section also matters when in atmosphere. Hydrolox is the worst choice of any bi-propellant on both counts. This applies to rockets as well as aircraft, which, together with the cost, is why there has never been a commercially viable hydrogen powered aircraft. The Shuttle, Buran, and Ariane, all went with hydrogen because using SRBs gives the military rocket manufacturers something to do during peacetime. Pure pork on all counts. Skylon uses hydrogen to cool their ramscoops, but their entire concept is sketchy. They have some very attractive upsides but they pay dearly in other ways, with hydrogen being a major cost driver in design, construction, and operation.

    Hydrogen safe turbines are in no way trivial or easy, despite tens of billion of dollars spent over decades researching them. That you think otherwise only demonstrates your complete ignorance on the subject.