SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
From the WinBeta subforum of reboot.pro:
I'm Pierre Schweitzer, one of the ReactOS developers. This is a free operating system that aims to re-implement Windows, but this time with an open source license.
ReactOS now supports reading files from NTFS volume. This was a long awaited feature people were asking for. And here it is.
You can see what I'm talking about on the three pictures [included in the fine article].
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
NTFS Now Supported in ReactOS LiveCD
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 42 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
The mosquito is the state bird of New Jersey.
-- Andy Warhol
(Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Friday November 07 2014, @05:23PM
Uhhh...riddle me this WHY WOULD YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT IS FREE? Seriously DaFuq? You are just trolling and looking for a reason to argue, good day.
ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday November 07 2014, @05:39PM
Speaking of DaFuq...what??
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Saturday November 08 2014, @10:19PM
Oh, you're saying if Microsoft makes Windows free, people can't steal it anymore?* Technically true I suppose...like I said, I'll believe "free Windows" when I see it. Maybe Microsoft could make their money off of the platform lock-in via their Office yearly subscriptions (barf) and other software. You'll have to excuse me if I don't anticipate radical about-faces from companies who've been following more or less the same business model for the last 30 years.
---
I was musing on the perspectives of success in the shower this morning...I suspect that many SD/SN FLOSSy-type posters would call "success" in the software world technically impressive products (a clever idea, or implemented in a particularly exciting way). The original hacker mentality (if you read any of that Stallman biography I linked you a little while ago) was all about eager programmers getting their hands on interesting-looking code and then tinkering around with it.
.
In contrast, the measure of "success" for a probably much larger portion of the world is: How well does it sell? If you look at computing history, many of the best-selling products were NOT the best choice technically speaking. x86 was cheaper, so it won. DOS wasn't entangled in lawsuits like BSD (although maybe it should have been), and cheap at the time (cf. commercial Unix), so it won long enough to bootstrap Windows. Hell, Unix itself most people would probably say is better technically speaking than Linux, but Linux was free and available.
.
So the hacker definition of "success" is directly at odds with the ~mainstream one, which is why there's so much frothing at the mouth, I think, in these arguments. And I, at least, get rather annoyed when people like you imply that Windows is the only "right" viewpoint and anyone who disagrees with you is a fool. I'll agree that Windows has its place; I will not, however, agree that it fills all places.
---
*There's the observation that "stealing" software is a bit of a misleading term to begin with, since you're not depriving the original owner of anything, but I don't expect that argument to have any impact on you other than making you angrier.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"