(Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 08 2014, @02:18PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Saturday November 08 2014, @02:18PM (#114033)
It's absolutely insane that there needs to be a non-systemd Debian fork.
It should be the other way around: the systemd supporters should have been the ones to fork Debian, integrated systemd, and then proven to the world that it was better, without affecting the rest of the Debian community and installations.
When developing any software, you make breaking changes in a separate development branch, not in your stable trunk or master branch. And you only integrate them if and when they become stable.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 08 2014, @11:32AM
Time for a Fork, perhaps he could lead it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 08 2014, @11:34AM
A NON-systemd Fork.
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 08 2014, @11:39AM
Fork it, we already have Buntu and Minty. Let's have another fork.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 08 2014, @12:16PM
If he forked it a lot of the better Debian devs might well follow him to the fork, it could become the BETTER Debian.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 08 2014, @02:18PM
It's absolutely insane that there needs to be a non-systemd Debian fork.
It should be the other way around: the systemd supporters should have been the ones to fork Debian, integrated systemd, and then proven to the world that it was better, without affecting the rest of the Debian community and installations.
When developing any software, you make breaking changes in a separate development branch, not in your stable trunk or master branch. And you only integrate them if and when they become stable.
(Score: 2) by jackb_guppy on Saturday November 08 2014, @04:58PM
Agrred -
The limited system in Ubuntu 14.04 that I have installed - daily fails (2 months now), I keep dropping in documentation and still no fix.