Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by khallow
I've been keeping up with the Ukraine conflict. I find it interesting how the proponents of the Russian side rely heavily on fallacies, whataboutism, and other dishonest rhetoric.

One of the more peculiar stances is an ad hominem where the news media of most of the developed world is partially or completely disregarded. Here's an example:

[Pav:] You don't seem to want to realise no mainstream source will ever give you a reason to believe anything that would make you less willing to pay taxes to defence companies. Perhaps you own some shares, or feel you benefit in some other way? I suppose it IS within the realm of possibility, though only by cosmic accident. It IS strangely fascinating and amusing talking to someone who is a true believer in the broken window fallacy (probably in the form of post WWII parables).

If you look at Pav's other postings on this, it's a remarkable dysfunctional chain of this crap. Even when he cites links, not a one supports his claims. For example:

[Pav:] Right.

This post contains Pav's defective arguments in a nutshell. It's just a story about the Ukrainian Prime Minister whining about his allies' statements with counterwhining from sources associated with the allies. What we actually had been speaking about at that point in the thread was violence, psychopaths, and corrupt oligarchs, none of which found their way into Pav's source.

Here's another example. MSNBC gets photobombed (they showed uncritically neo-nazi symbols on the uniforms of the soldiers involved in the video) by the Azov Battallion, which a genuine neo-nazi military unit in the Ukrainian military. So what? This is far from the first time covert product placement has been a thing in military news.

Another example is a blogger link from this post. It's just a few pages of pulling stuff out of the author's ass confidently. For example:

Ukraine’s President Zelensky told visiting US Senators in early June that the country’s military defense against Russia and the completion of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline are inextricably intertwined.

Once the project is completed, Ukraine will be deprived of the funds required to fund defense spending and defend Europe’s eastern border.

“Nord Stream 2 will cut Ukraine off from gas supplies, which will cost us at least USD 3 billion per year.”

Zelensky, always the joker, wants Russia to pay $3 billion per year so he personally can defend Europe from Russia who is paying him.

Notice how the author smoothly transitions from a fact - that Zelensky stated that closing a particular pipeline would cost the Ukraine a lot of money - to the unsubstantiated claim that Zelensky then wants Russia to pay for it. This is then further logically mangled into the idea that it somehow explains the Ukraine-Russian friction we're seeing now.

Zelensky’s Ukraine is shuffling Europe, NATO, and the US closer and closer to the line where one mistake in diplomacy, one stupid move by any of Ukraine’s infamous Neanderthal nationalist volunteers, and bang!

Let us further note that such infamy is only on the Russian supporters side. Somehow everyone else has come to grips with the reality that there's a small number of fascists/neo-nazis in the Ukraine military. My favorite quote of this batch:

In response to this, Ukraine mobilized over ½ its army or over 170,000 troops to the frontline with all the heavy weapons at its disposal accompanying them.

This force was a supposed counter to the Russian invasion army, which again, was just over the border.

In reality, the Russian army staged planned war games near the city of Yelnya, 160 miles (257 kilometers) from the Ukrainian border. You read that right, the Russian army was160 miles away from the Ukrainian border even though every major western publication made it sound like they were already in Kiev.

As I noted at the time, now those "war games" are inside the borders of the Ukraine. Looks like the Ukraine was right on that one!

While I didn't say it at the time, if the author is so horribly wrong about the "war games" and the infamy of Ukrainian troops what else is he horribly wrong about? This isn't the alternate media source I'm looking for.

Then there's the king of one liner putdowns:

[fustakrakich:] "Your" take is just mass media propaganda. Nobody wants war but the US

And yet we see Russia making those aggressive moves towards war. It also furthers the propaganda narrative that this is merely a showdown between Russia and US with Ukraine interests being completely irrelevant.

Also that Runaway journal was about some academic blaming the US or possibly the Western world for the conflict. At one point Runaway claimed:

[Runaway1956:] You didn't listen to the man, did ya? The "west" engineered that coup. Mearsheimer doesn't say so, but I'm aware that the Koch brothers were prime movers in the coup. We quite literally backed fascists and neo-Nazis in the coup.

In other words, there was no support for Runaway's assertion there from his source. In fact, I've googled this subject a bit and never found Runaway linking to a source for the Koch brothers accusation - though if he had, I would have stated that it shows good taste in revolutions on their part.

Anyway, I think this illustrates some of the weirder failures of the pro-Russian side in this conflict. Namely, obsessing over sources of evidence rather than the evidence itself. But given how unflattering that evidence is, maybe this is the best they can do?

All I can say is that it's probably a lot safer to complain about media bias than to defend Putin only to have him stab you in the back a few weeks later. But it begs the question: why is imaginary CIA/MIC involvement enough to completely torpedo a media source, but not being horribly wrong and/or irrelevant?

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @06:39AM (44 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @06:39AM (#1224360) Homepage Journal

    Citations. I've still not seen tanks in or near Kyiv. Kharkiv, maybe, not anywhere on the Belarussian border.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @07:04AM (20 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @07:04AM (#1224365)

    Here is video of tanks crossing the border from Belarus into Ukraine: https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2022/02/24/ukraine-video-tanks-belarus-border-pleitgen-vpx.cnn [cnn.com].

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @07:27AM (1 child)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @07:27AM (#1224368) Homepage Journal

      Thank you for the citation - strange, though, that only CNN seems to see tanks along that portion of the border. I'll keep it in mind . . .

      --
      Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:34PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:34PM (#1224617)

        OK Baghdad Bob.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @07:46AM (17 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @07:46AM (#1224370) Homepage Journal

      OK, I had a little bit of a brain fart. Neither you nor CNN has shown that tanks have entered Ukraine from Belarus. Senkika is right at the junction of the three nations. In fact, a blurb states that the Three Sister Monument is still standing in Senkika. Those tanks may have come from Belarus, or they may have come directly from Russia. Either way, Senkika is north by north-east of Kiev. So, no tanks bearing down on Kiev, that we can tell, yet. Maybe they will, but you haven't shown it yet.

      --
      Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:06AM (16 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:06AM (#1224376)

        Kyiv isn't right on the border. However, Senkika is far closer to Kyiv than it is to either of the provinces in eastern Ukraine whose independence Putin recognized a few days ago. Yes, I'm speculating that those tanks would be headed for Kyiv. But why send ground forces into Ukraine there if you only intend to occupy those two provinces in eastern Ukraine? It doesn't make sense, particularly when Russia has ground forces ready much closer to those areas.

        I should note that it's not 100% certain whose tanks those are crossing the border, whether they're Russian or Belarusian tanks entering Ukraine.

        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:18AM (15 children)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:18AM (#1224379) Homepage Journal

          But why send ground forces into Ukraine there if you only intend to occupy those two provinces in eastern Ukraine?

          I think that Putin wants all of Donbass region. He needs to roll back Ukraine forces from the region, so he encircles the region, pulverizes everything inside it, occupies much more than he actually wants. THEN, he negotiates, "surrendering" those portions that he doesn't actually want. That is, you negotiate from a position of strength.

          We'll see what actually happens, but that's my bet.

          --
          Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:43AM (8 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:43AM (#1224393)

            Um, Runaway, aren't you at work right now? Shouldn't you be attending to the vacuum mold injectors, to make those leaf-blowers everyone loves? You would not want your employer to know what you use their broadband connection for, at night, when you are all alone in the plant, given your hatred of everything they stand for, and your support of Anders Behring Breivik, would you? Not a threat. just a suggestion.

            • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:49AM (7 children)

              by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @08:49AM (#1224399) Homepage Journal

              ari, ari, ari - do you not understand that Runaway does whatever the hell he wants to do? When do you figure that out? Not only at work, but out in the countryside, or whichever city I want to go to. I just do what I want to do, and no one can do anything about it.

              --
              Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @05:18PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @05:18PM (#1224545)

                Poor sad russian shill, the world is tired of you and even khallow is seeing through your bullshit.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @10:35PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @10:35PM (#1224667)

                Whataya expect, he's a stalker getting 25¢ per post from the CCP, not an FBI agent. Of course you shouldn't expect much good from either of 'em.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @03:36AM (4 children)

                by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @03:36AM (#1225007)

                Runaway is too busy dealing with the vacuum between his ears.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @03:48AM (3 children)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @03:48AM (#1225009)

                  Surely you can do better. That was not even worth that 25¢.

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @04:34AM (2 children)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @04:34AM (#1225016)

                    Way worse to respond to your own post as AC to pretend you have kkkomrades!

                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @09:22PM (1 child)

                      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 26 2022, @09:22PM (#1225173)

                      I know you are but what am I?

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 08 2022, @12:55AM

                        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 08 2022, @12:55AM (#1227498)

                        A moron

          • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @09:04PM (5 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24 2022, @09:04PM (#1224630)

            I'm the AC you replied to last night. I see that aristarchus took the opportunity to reply and say nothing of value.

            As I see it, you're a fool. You're essentially taking Putin at his word. He's already shown he can't be trusted. In the preceding weeks, he claimed that all the troops near Ukraine's border and in Belarus were just military exercises. He claimed that the military exercises were ending and that the troops were returning home. That's totally not what happened, and many of those troops are now attacking Ukraine. If Putin had told the truth, those troops would not be invading Ukraine right now.

            Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. They interfered in Belarus' election in 2020 to keep pro-Russian leaders in power, effectively making Belarus a puppet country for Putin. Even if Putin were to stop at the Donbass region right now, why would you trust he's going to be satisfied? What makes you think he won't decide to just invade the rest of Ukraine a bit later?

            As I've said in other posts, the Sudetenland is a pretty good historical precedent for what's happening here. Hitler had already annexed Austria. He then annexed the Sudetenland in 1938. Czechoslovakia wasn't welcome to participate in the conference that produced the Munich Agreement, but they were pressured by their allies into accepting the agreement. The Munich Agreement effectively forced Czechoslovakia to give the Sudetenland to Germany, in exchange for a promise that Hitler would stop seizing territory. In Czechoslovakia, the agreement was referred to as the Munich Betrayal, because they were sacrificed to Germany to appease Hitler. The agreement lasted until March of 1939, when Hitler ordered the invasion of the rest of Czechoslovakia.

            Assuming Putin will stop at the Donbass region is like trusting Hitler to stop with the Sudetenland. Even if he stops for now with Donbass, what makes you think he won't take the rest of Ukraine later? If he gets away with that, what makes you think he won't decide to attack Poland, or Lithuania later to directly connect Kaliningrad with the rest of Russia? For that matter, what makes you think he wouldn't try to annex Latvia and Estonia as well? Maybe you think Putin wouldn't attack the Baltic States because they are NATO members, but NATO has shown weakness in responding to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That might embolden him to try directly attacking NATO members. Can the Baltic States really trust that NATO will aid them if Russia attacks?

            I say that you're a fool because you're ignoring history. Sure, it would be nice if Putin honored his agreements, but history shows that appeasement doesn't work. Putin already thinks he's in a position of strength because NATO isn't directly engaging Russia in combat, and he believes the risk of a Russian nuclear strike is sufficient deterrent.

            • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @09:43PM (4 children)

              by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @09:43PM (#1224651) Homepage Journal

              You may be right. Putin may be repeating history. I don't think so. Russia has been advancing the same concerns for years now - they don't want NATO with all their arms sitting on their very doorstep, less than 500 miles from Moscow. I believe that when Russia has the Donbass for a buffer, they'll calm down. If/when Ukraine applies for membership in NATO, they may get riled up again - but probably not invade again.

              Time will tell. But I think it a mistake to confuse Putin with Hitler. Putin isn't advancing the theory of a master race. He hasn't organized a Putin Youth movement, nor has he directed the women in his nation to only marry Russian Supermen. There is no Nietzsche publishing fairy tales about the origins of the Ubermenschen, and all the lesser races.

              Meanwhile, most of the other states that Putin might want to annex are already members of NATO. If he should attack any of them, then our response seems to be pretty clear - we attack to defend them. Putin knows that as well as you or I.

              Ukraine is unique among eastern Russian nations, at this moment in time. Ukraine played their cards, and they don't have a winning hand. It sucks, but they chose to play the game. Now, they'll take their lumps.

              --
              Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
              • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Magic Oddball on Thursday February 24 2022, @11:08PM (3 children)

                by Magic Oddball (3847) on Thursday February 24 2022, @11:08PM (#1224684) Journal

                There's an interesting article on the "it's all about NATO" theory that you might want to read:

                https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/02/putin-war-is-not-about-nato.html [slate.com]

                Reportedly, Russia did little more than grumble a bit during the waves of NATO expansion, including when Ukraine first started asking to join in the late 90s; it didn't react with anti-Western rhetoric, threats, or invasions of its neighbors. There's also that NATO members' refusal to accept countries with territorial disputes means that there was virtually no chance of the Ukraine being allowed in after Russia began targeting it back in 2014, so that doesn't really make sense as a reason to invade.

                Putin's aggression instead has reliably been in response to nearby countries ditching authoritarian corrupt pro-Russian governments in favor of democracy:

                A longer look at Putin’s two decades in power shows that, above all, he fears political competition in the neighborhood. When mass protests over rigged elections swept across the post-Soviet space in 2003–05, toppling the Georgian and Kyrgyz incumbents and preventing the pro-Russian candidate from taking office in Ukraine, the Kremlin exploded with fiery rhetoric about Western-backed anti-Russian plots. A recent book on conspiracy theories in the Russian media since 1995 shows that the 2003–05 “color revolutions” were the top source of conspiratorial, anti-Western narratives. All 1997–2002 NATO enlargement summits are lower in the ranking of analyzed events. American realists have long argued that Russia was too weak to strike back with actions, but evidence shows that the Kremlin did not react with strong rhetoric either. Instead of decrying NATO expansion, Russia prioritized complaints about Western political “meddling” in its neighboring countries, by which Russia meant U.S. and European support for domestic democratization drives.

                In 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and instigated an armed insurgency in eastern Ukraine, NATO membership for Ukraine hadn’t even been on the agenda. Rather, the spark for Russia was the ouster of the increasingly authoritarian pro-Russian president, Yanukovych, following months of street protests. Those “Euromaidan” protests had erupted after Yanukovych backpedaled, following pressure and bribery from Russia, from signing a trade agreement with the European Union.

                So why was 2014 so concerning to Russia that it chose to invade? Given Putin’s rhetoric about Euromaidan as a Western-backed plot, the most obvious conclusion is that he was afraid that regime change and democratization in Ukraine might reach—or at least set an example for—Russian society and destabilize Putin’s increasingly consolidated authoritarianism. Research on the color revolutions and on the third wave of democratization in the region shows that this neighborhood effect was real. In other words, it’s not NATO at its doorsteps that’s so concerning to the Kremlin, but political competition, because it threatens authoritarian stability and introduces prospects of democratization.

                I think that considering how aggressive Putin has been about silencing criticism of the Russian government within his own country, the above theory makes a lot of sense.

                • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 24 2022, @11:16PM (2 children)

                  by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 24 2022, @11:16PM (#1224686) Homepage Journal

                  I thought that Ukraine officially asked for membership in NATO in 2008, but NATO didn't act on the request. I have little idea why no action was taken at that time, the disputed border problem came later, right?

                  The color revolutions - do you mean they weren't instigated by the West? We certainly gave them a lot of tacit approval and support, if not explicit.

                  --
                  Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday February 25 2022, @03:18AM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 25 2022, @03:18AM (#1224724) Journal

                    The color revolutions - do you mean they weren't instigated by the West? We certainly gave them a lot of tacit approval and support, if not explicit.

                    Sounds like there might be something wrong with that narrative! I think the key is the delusion that the West somehow has a magical talent in instigating a large number [wikipedia.org] of such successful revolutions with considerable public turnout and support.

                    It's like the British Empire blaming the US revolution on the machinations of the French. Clearly it wouldn't have happened if the French hadn't instigated the whole thing! I guess it's better than acknowledging that someone elsewhere in the world doesn't prefer your government!

                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday February 25 2022, @03:26AM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 25 2022, @03:26AM (#1224727) Journal
                    And what's bizarre is that the countries whining about color revolutions desperately need them! Sure, I don't expect people like Putin or Xi who would get their asses kicked in some future color revolution to be on board. But somebody needs to do something about their shitty governments and its the public who gets that job. I think rather than whining about US influence and support in these revolutions, how about we figure out how to make more of them and encourage them to be more democratic?
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:14AM (22 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:14AM (#1226028)

    It's official:

    "Putin May Circle Kiev with Tanks, But He’ll Never Gain the Hearts and Souls of the Iranian People"

    - Sleepy Joe

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:18AM (21 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:18AM (#1226029) Homepage Journal

      Yeah, a lot has changed in the last 6 days. Belarus is most definitely part of the invasion now. I can't/won't retract what I said above, but now Belarus figures into everything.

      --
      Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:12AM (7 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:12AM (#1226057) Journal
        There's a growing list of things that Putin has done for which his apologists had made a point of noting he had not done them: not invade Ukraine in 2014, only playing war games in Belarus, not declare war on the Ukraine, not invade Ukraine from Belarus, not use weapons with large kill areas. My bet is that there will be a lot more walking back of the things that Putin hasn't done yet.
        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:22AM (6 children)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:22AM (#1226065) Homepage Journal

          There will never be any walking back on the other side, will there? You still think the Azov Battalion never did anything to provoke Russia, or to provoke Russians.

          --
          Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:34PM (5 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:34PM (#1226166) Journal

            You still think the Azov Battalion never did anything to provoke Russia, or to provoke Russians.

            Indeed. By your own words. If there was any actual provocation, you would have mentioned that instead of this pathetic whining about nazis. You can barely find nazis in the Ukraine, much less find a legitimate provocation.

            • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:39PM (4 children)

              by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:39PM (#1226171) Homepage Journal

              You've dismissed the battalion, you've dismissed it's part in your precious Maidan, you claim it has no influence on Ukraine politics, and more.

              You can excuse and dismiss anything and everything, so long as it supports your "side".

              Once again, I invite you to watch Mearsheimer's presentation, which more or less predicts the current situation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4 [youtube.com]

              --
              Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:52PM (3 children)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @03:52PM (#1226177) Journal

                You've dismissed the battalion, you've dismissed it's part in your precious Maidan, you claim it has no influence on Ukraine politics, and more.

                Indeed. How big is it, Runaway?

                • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:33PM (2 children)

                  by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:33PM (#1226186) Homepage Journal

                  https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Azov_Battalion [fandom.com]

                  https://jewishunpacked.com/the-azov-movement-lets-talk-about-ukraines-nazi-problem/ [jewishunpacked.com]

                  Azov’s Nazi ties are not subtle.

                  Their emblem, which Azov soldiers wear on their uniforms feature a ‘Wolfsangel’ and ‘Black Sun,’ two symbols associated with Nazi Germany and neo-Nazi’s today.

                  In 2010, the battalion’s first commander and a former Ukrainian parliamentarian, Andriy Biletsky, said he believed Ukraine’s national purpose should be to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade … against Semite-led Untermenschen [subhumans].”

                  Not that I approve of anything Facebook, but:

                  Banned from Facebook
                  In 2019, Facebook released its “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations” policy which prevents “organizations or individuals that proclaim a violent mission or are engaged in violence to have a presence on Facebook.”

                  Under the policy, praising the Azov Movement was banned, classifying Azov alongside others such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Islamic State.

                  Oddly - Facebook makes an about-face on the Azov movement last week:

                  Last week, Facebook reviewed its policy in relation to Russia’s war on Ukraine and changed it, according to Business Insider.

                  “For the time being, we are making a narrow exception for praise of the Azov Regiment strictly in the context of defending Ukraine, or in their role as part of the Ukraine National Guard,” a spokesperson from Facebook’s parent company, Meta, told Insider.

                  If we were to ask a Ukrainian, we would probably be told that Ukies aren't prejudiced, of course.

                  https://vnexplorer.net/?#indian-and-african-students-fleeing-ukraine-say-they-face-racism-at-border-ec20225326967.html [vnexplorer.net]

                  Indian and African students fleeing Ukraine say they face racism at border
                  01/03/2022
                  As the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues, foreign students attempting to leave the country say they are experiencing racist treatment by Ukrainian security forces and border officials.

                  One African medical student told CNN that she and other foreigners were ordered off the public transit bus at a checkpoint between Ukraine and Poland border.

                  They were told to stand aside as the bus drove off with only Ukrainian nationals on board, she says.

                  Can we stop pretending that Ukrainians are innocents, who have done nothing to provoke the situation? 2% of the vote doesn't amount to much, but it's the Azov battallion that has been sent into Donbass for the past 8 years, to keep the shit stirred. Government doesn't want to openly associate with the Azov, but government is happy to use them to suppress people that government doesn't like.

                  --
                  Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:40PM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:40PM (#1226189) Journal

                    Can we stop pretending that Ukrainians are innocents, who have done nothing to provoke the situation?

                    What provocation? You listed nothing that was a provocation. Try again.

                    There is no pretending here. The Ukrainians really are the innocent party here who have not done anything to provoke the situation.

                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:42PM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 02 2022, @04:42PM (#1226190) Journal
                    And since you didn't answer the question, the Azov Battallion is no more than 3000 people (some foreign) - in an army of 200k in a land of 41 million people.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 03 2022, @09:47PM (12 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 03 2022, @09:47PM (#1226550)

        Putin obviously calculated feeble-minded Joe correctly. But he apparently didn't realize that everyone else also knows that Joe is a useless figurehead, and everyone else isn't simply going to cave, just because this country is ineffectual right now. Regardless of the hearts and souls of the Iranian people.

        I wonder if Xi is slowing his cakewalk through Taiwan.

        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday March 03 2022, @09:54PM (11 children)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 03 2022, @09:54PM (#1226551) Homepage Journal

          To be fair, no one could have predicted Germany's response to this shitshow. They've done little more at this point than hand-wringing and complaining, but they've done it more forcefully than anyone might have imagined.

          --
          Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 03 2022, @10:22PM (10 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 03 2022, @10:22PM (#1226554)

            Random response is better than nothing. I truly didn't expect megacorps to go after Putin like they did Trump. It shows how close they are to China. It would be so nice if this country weren't financing Putin with oil purchases. Strange bedfellows, all.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 04 2022, @04:08AM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 04 2022, @04:08AM (#1226615) Journal

              I truly didn't expect megacorps to go after Putin like they did Trump. It shows how close they are to China.

              Ever consider that megacorps aren't close to any of these leaders? The kind of toady that wants to get bossed around by these authoritarian leaders doesn't run successful megacorps.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @04:34AM (8 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @04:34AM (#1226620)

              In fact, for some, like Exxon, cutting ties with Russia can spark a 'virtue-signaling' ESG boost with minimal impact to the company's actual business, and as Bloomberg's Tim Culpan remarks in a very frank opinion piece, consumer brands halting sales in Russia "smells of opportunism" to some, with transportation constrained, limited access to international payments systems, and a sinking ruble...

              - These Are All The Companies That Have Cut Ties With Russia [zerohedge.com]

              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 04 2022, @04:39PM (7 children)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 04 2022, @04:39PM (#1226676) Journal
                I imagine if the same thing happened to China, Exxon would do the same to them. And it's amusing how butthurt ol' "Tyler Durden" is by the mean, opportunistic corporations are. Here's hoping he or they didn't invest in the Ruble going in on the invasion.
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @05:58PM (6 children)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @05:58PM (#1226691)

                  But mega-abusers like Apple — who live and breathe Yuan — wouldn't punish their partner in crime. The rapacious, bestial megacorps are the message; the pseudonymous-Durden is just another messenger.

                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 04 2022, @06:17PM (5 children)

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 04 2022, @06:17PM (#1226696) Journal
                    They sure would to make another Ruble. But I think the missing lesson here is that there's levels of rapacity and bestiality well beyond that of megacorps, and Russia is plumbing those depths right now. How many tales like this will we collectively listen to before we just stop paying attention?

                    "Sure, Russia is being really evil right now, but whatabout Apple?"
                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @07:38PM (4 children)

                      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @07:38PM (#1226708)

                      How many tales like this will we collectively listen to before we just stop paying attention?

                      The day the last real American-based business is shuttered, and all those proud American factory towns are left for the next generation of American Pickers to dig through the deserted and forgotten remains of our heritage for rusty gold. Apple's absolutely nothin' unique in this regard... it's just so easy with this example for the common [ex-]consumer to see how they're all doin' it.

                      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 04 2022, @07:41PM (3 children)

                        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 04 2022, @07:41PM (#1226710) Journal

                        The day the last real American-based business is shuttered, and all those proud American factory towns are left for the next generation of American Pickers to dig through the deserted and forgotten remains of our heritage for rusty gold.

                        I bet we'll ignore this bullshit long before we get to that point. I notice, for a glaring example, that no one has actually stated what Apple supposedly did wrong. They're just a mean ol' megacorp that deals with Yuan.

                        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @07:43PM (2 children)

                          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @07:43PM (#1226711)

                          Supposedly? See my previous post.

                          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 04 2022, @07:52PM (1 child)

                            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 04 2022, @07:52PM (#1226713) Journal
                            Indeed. Which is why I brought it up. You (or another AC) say nothing about what Apple supposedly did.
                            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @10:41PM

                              by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 04 2022, @10:41PM (#1226734)

                              Sigh. We'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.