Static vs dynamic typing:
We need static typing. But one of those types should be 'dynamic'.
Functional vs OOP:
We need the mechanisms of OOP and those of Functional programming combined orthogonally in one language. Functional objects. We'll never get that is we start with one of these styles and tack on the other. The language has to be designed for both from scratch.
Starting Score:
1
point
Moderation
+1
Interesting=1,
Total=1
Extra 'Interesting' Modifier
0
Karma-Bonus Modifier
+1
Total Score:
3
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 05 2022, @01:51PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Tuesday April 05 2022, @01:51PM (#1234972)
um... if the wikipedia definition of functional programming is correct, C++ has been doing both OOP and functional programming ever since it was possible to define "operator()". or am I confused about the definition of "functional"?
(Score: 3, Interesting) by hendrikboom on Monday April 04 2022, @02:14AM (1 child)
Some of these wars need peace negotiations.
Static vs dynamic typing:
We need static typing. But one of those types should be 'dynamic'.
Functional vs OOP:
We need the mechanisms of OOP and those of Functional programming combined orthogonally in one language. Functional objects. We'll never get that is we start with one of these styles and tack on the other. The language has to be designed for both from scratch.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 05 2022, @01:51PM
um... if the wikipedia definition of functional programming is correct, C++ has been doing both OOP and functional programming ever since it was possible to define "operator()".
or am I confused about the definition of "functional"?