Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday November 13 2014, @10:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the pump-it-up dept.

Pat Garofalo writes in an op-ed in US News & World Report that with the recent drop in oil prices, there's something policymakers can do that will offset at least some of the negative effects of the currently low prices, while also removing a constant thorn in the side of American transportation and infrastructure policy: Raise the gas tax. The current 18.4 cent per gallon [federal] gas tax has not been raised since 1993, making it about 11 cents per gallon today, in constant dollars. Plus, as fuel efficiency has gotten better and Americans have started driving less, the tax has naturally raised less revenue anyway. And that's a problem because the tax fills the Highway Trust Fund, which is, not to put too fine a point on it, broke so that in recent years Congress has had to patch it time and time again to fill the gap. According to the Tax Policy Center's Howard Gleckman, if Congress doesn't make a move, "it will fumble one of those rare opportunities when the economic and policy stars align almost perfectly." The increase can be phased in slowly, a few cents per month, perhaps, so that the price of gas doesn't jump overnight. When prices eventually do creep back up thanks to economic factors, hopefully the tax will hardly be noticed.

Consumers are already starting to buy the sort of gas-guzzling vehicles, including Hummers, that had been going out of style as gas prices rose; that's bad for both the environment and consumers, because gas prices are inevitably going to increase again. According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, taxes last year, even before the current drop in prices, made up 12 percent of the cost of a gallon of gasoline, down from 28 percent in 2000. And compared to other developed countries, US gas taxes are pretty much a joke. While we're at it, an even better idea, as a recent report from the Urban Institute makes clear, would be indexing the gas tax to inflation (pdf), so this problem doesn't consistently arise. "The status quo simply isn't sustainable, from an infrastructure or environmental perspective," concludes Garofalo. "So raise the gas tax now; someday down the line, it will look like a brilliant move."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by carguy on Saturday November 15 2014, @02:04AM

    by carguy (568) Subscriber Badge on Saturday November 15 2014, @02:04AM (#116101)

    for FatPhil -- here is a bibliography that will get you started into the engineering research on road damage,
        http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~djc13/vehicledynamics/proj8.html [cam.ac.uk]
    If you are into road design/construction or suspension design, there is a lot of interesting reading here.

    I've read papers (don't remember which ones now) that even claim the damage is proportional to axle-load^5 (!!) A lot depends on the details of the truck and suspension. For example, a suspension that lets the tires & axle bounce up and down (poorly damped) after hitting a bump, then delivers a number of "hammer blows" (speaking colloquially) to the road.

    There are test centers where known pavement constructions are worn out in reasonably controlled (and accelerated) experiments, here is one in USA, there are others around the world,
        http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/labs/pavement/ [dot.gov]
    The test wheels/tires go back and forth, 24/7 while the test pavement is observed.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday November 15 2014, @09:38AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday November 15 2014, @09:38AM (#116163) Homepage
    Awesome, thanks! I would say that'll be my weekend reading (strangely, this topic now interests me quite a lot. I now live in a cobbled part of a very old town, and if I enter a debate on the possible restriction of vehicles being let into the old town area, I want to be armed with real facts.), but I've got to make up those billable hours first...

    Dear mods - give carguy mod-points NOW!
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 2) by carguy on Saturday November 15 2014, @02:52PM

      by carguy (568) Subscriber Badge on Saturday November 15 2014, @02:52PM (#116196)

      For your cobbled roads, a lot probably depends on the base material under the road, how thick and how well packed/tamped. One thing that is almost guaranteed -- if you limit the truck traffic to very low speeds (guessing 15-20 mph?) then suspension dynamics will be minimal. At low speed, the road damage will come from simple static loading and unloading of each stone/brick as each tire passes over. You could even make some slo-mo video (high frame rate) of trucks at higher speeds, to show how the tires bounce and slam into the road--might be useful at a town board meeting?

      No mod points (yet), but don't really need them.

      I bill by the hour too, but keeping the neighborhood nice also rates pretty high on my list.