Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Friday November 14 2014, @11:59AM   Printer-friendly
from the separation-of-concerns dept.

Martin Brinkmann at gHacks reports

Electrolysis [(a.k.a. e10s a.k.a. multi-process Firefox)] has been in development for a long time but has been prioritized only recently by Mozilla (again) after not being in focus for some time.

[...]The core idea behind the new architecture is to separate web content from the core Firefox process. The two main advantages of doing so are security and performance.

Security benefits from potential sandboxing of web contents and separation of processes, and performance mainly from the browser UI not being affected by web contents.

[...]The Are We e10s yet website lists popular browser add-ons and whether or not they are compatible with e10s yet. If you browse the list of add-ons on that page you will notice that many add-ons are not yet compatible.

Mozilla made the decision to enable e10s for Firefox Nightly versions by default with [the November 7] update. This does not mean that the last phase of development has begun and that stable users will get the feature in three release cycles, however.

[...]users can disable e10s

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Gertlex on Friday November 14 2014, @02:09PM

    by Gertlex (3966) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 14 2014, @02:09PM (#115898)

    Funnier part is that (apparently) IE 8 had this feature prior to Chrome, as well.

    (I was just looking into what the status of multi-process FF was a few days ago. I am potentially bummed that the guy doing Pale Moon doesn't want to add this capability.)

  • (Score: 2) by everdred on Friday November 14 2014, @06:54PM

    by everdred (110) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 14 2014, @06:54PM (#116010) Homepage Journal

    > I am potentially bummed that the guy doing Pale Moon doesn't want to add this capability.

    That's disappointing to hear.