GPS has a new job. It does a great job of telling us our location, but the network of hyper-accurate clocks in space could get a fix on something far more elusive: dark matter.
Dark matter makes up 80 per cent of the universe's matter but scarcely interacts with ordinary matter. A novel particle is the most popular candidate, but Andrei Derevianko ( http://www.dereviankogroup.com/dark-matter-atomic-clocks-idea-call-experimental-efforts/ ) at the University of Nevada, Reno, and Maxim Pospelov ( http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/people/maxim-pospelov ) at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada propose that kinks or cracks in the quantum fields that permeate the universe could be the culprit.
If they are right, fundamental properties such as the mass of an electron or the strength of electromagnetic fields would change at the kinks. "The effect is essentially locally modifying fundamental constants," Derevianko says. Clocks would be affected too, measuring time slightly differently as a result.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26575-dark-matter-could-be-seen-in-gps-time-glitches.html
[Abstract/Paper]:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.1244
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphys3137.html
(Score: 1) by In hydraulis on Wednesday November 19 2014, @03:20AM
So your issue is simply a matter of how long it takes to verify or alternatively disprove a hypothesis?
If so, what timeline would you find acceptable? Clearly 26 years is fine, as per the above example of the neutrino. How about 126?
Also, whatever number you set as the threshold, be sure to explain how your choice is not an arbitrary one.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday November 19 2014, @09:02AM
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves