SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The developers behind the sequel to legendary videogame Elite have, to the anger and dismay of fans, announced they've dropped the promised offline singleplayer mode. The game is due to be released in under a month. With the title having raised about $1.5 million from Kickstarter, and millions more in subsequent campaigns that advertised the feature, many of those following the project are livid. A complaints thread on the official Elite forums has swelled to over 450 pages in merely three days, with backers demanding refunds. It is down to the discretion of Frontier, the game's developer, whether to process refund requests of original backers.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Anger as Elite:Dangerous Drops Offline Singleplayer
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 28 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
OK, enough hype.
-- Larry Wall in the perl man page
(Score: 2) by mojo chan on Wednesday November 19 2014, @08:57AM
Wow, I know hatred of China is big in the US, but it's still shocking to see it for the rest of us...
Yeah, some parts of China suck. Some parts of the US suck too. That doesn't mean that you can't get high end, well paid manufacturing done there. I've stuff made in China before, and it wasn't done in a sweatshop or bad conditions. The factory was clean, the workers well paid. I went there because no local companies were flexible enough to do what I wanted at a reasonable price. The quality of the finished products was extremely high, and actually had a lower failure rate than the UK board house that made the first batch of prototype PCBs.
You get what you pay for, anywhere.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
(Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday November 19 2014, @01:38PM
Google "Potemkin village" and get back to us.
UK board house
UK is small. In the US you just contract "down south" and it ends up costing about the same overall by the time you're done with tax rebates and lower transport costs and faster deliveries and generally better quality. In the UK its too small so there isn't a "somewhere else" and you gotta go China, so I sympathize.
On the other hand you got your southern/Mediterranean countries in euroland which are in economic collapse, so they'll work cheap until the revolution or breakup of euroland or nationalization of industry, so you're in a geopolitical risk scenario.
(Score: 2) by Lagg on Wednesday November 19 2014, @08:17PM
You can't just take an awful reputation that China willingly made for itself and go "welp, 'murikans hating them foreigners". As sympathetic as I am to the people there, the government is shit at a level that our own in the US is only just beginning to approach and the sweatshop transistor stereotype is a well earned and willingly reinforced one. You can probably get high end manufacturing there yes, just like anywhere else. But you can also probably get free healthcare in the US somewhere. These things are a minority. I'd love to put the sweatshop transistor crap behind us as much as the next guy. But the fact is that the chinese government doesn't really care and are letting the abuse continue.
This is all kind of besides the point anyway because what grandparent said was hardly hatred. It's a genuine advantage his company has and statistically parts manufactured in the US and Japan are going to be on average higher quality. If someone is still able to maintain profit and do that I whole-heartedly encourage them to advertise the fact. I only wish he'd have given the company name so I can put it in my mental whitelist when deciding which stuff to buy.
http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿