Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Tuesday May 10 2022, @11:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-the-USA-and-Europe-stuffed dept.

COVID-19 Vaccines May Be Significantly Less Effective in People With Severe Obesity:

New research suggests that adults (aged 18 or older) with severe obesity generate a significantly weaker immune response to vaccination compared to those with normal weight. The study was conducted by Professor Volkan Demirhan Yumuk from Istanbul University in Turkey and colleagues and was presented at this year's European Congress on Obesity (ECO) in Maastricht, Netherlands (May 4-7).

The study also found that people with severe obesity (BMI of more than 40kg/m2) vaccinated with Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine generated significantly more antibodies than those vaccinated with CoronaVac (inactivated SARSCoV2) vaccine, suggesting that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine might be a better choice for this vulnerable population.

Obesity is a disease complicating the course of COVID-19, and the vaccine antibody response in adults with obesity may be compromised. Vaccines against influenza, hepatitis B, and rabies, have shown reduced responses in people with obesity.

To find out more, researchers investigated antibody responses following Pfizer/BioNTech and CoronaVac vaccination in 124 adults (average age 42-63 years) with severe obesity who visited the Obesity Center at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospitals, between August and November 2021. They also recruited a control group of 166 normal weight adults (BMI less than 25kg/m2, average age 39-47 years) who were visiting the Cerrahpasa Hospitals Vaccination Unit.

Researchers measured antibody levels in blood samples taken from patients and normal weight controls who had received two doses of either the Pfizer/BioNTech or CoronaVac vaccine and had their second dose four weeks earlier. The participants were classified by infection history as either previously having COVID-19 or not (confirmed by their antibody profile).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 11 2022, @01:59AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 11 2022, @01:59AM (#1243985)

    Mass-dependent dosage would be a logical thing to study now that the rush is over.

    Except there is no money in it.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=2, Redundant=1, Interesting=1, Underrated=2, Touché=1, Total=7
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 11 2022, @02:40AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 11 2022, @02:40AM (#1243988)

    Time to revise the reward system so there is money in it for someone! Keeping some people out of emergency wards would save plenty of money, system wide (or country wide). This could make good university research, funded by NIH.

  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 11 2022, @03:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 11 2022, @03:54AM (#1243991)

    "troll?"

    For stating the facts of the reality today, of the for-profit big pharmas' modus operandi?

    On the bright side, I guess there are some young naive idealistic ones among the SN community. SN needs more young recruits.