Researcher warns of risks with using alternative data in lending:
Traditional credit scoring is based on a person's demonstrated ability to take on debt and pay it off. But with the dawn of larger data pools and access to more sophisticated modeling programs, lenders and credit agencies are taking more nonfinancial factors into rating creditworthiness, particularly those without an extensive credit history. This group tends to include vulnerable populations who are often more susceptible to predatory lending practices.
The problem is the systems developing these alternative scores can be like a black box, according to University of Georgia financial regulation researcher Lindsay Sain Jones. With the pool of personal data available growing, Jones argues that it's time to take a second look at how the American credit scoring system works and is regulated.
[...] In their recent paper, Jones and her co-author argue further regulation of financial reporting entities — both large credit bureaus and new data collectors — is needed in the same way gas, electric and water providers regulated their services. They argue participation in the credit system has become as necessary as having a phone or electricity.
[...] Jones and her co-author are also concerned that much of the lifestyle-related data points lenders correlate with creditworthiness can connect to race, gender, age, socioeconomic status, a person's ZIP code or where they attended college. Successfully challenging this kind of disparate impact under the ECOA [Ed: Equal Credit Opportunity Act] is nearly impossible.
One agency pulled information on how often people pay for gas at the pump versus paying inside the store. People who paid at the pump were deemed more creditworthy.
"There are all kinds of factors that can be correlated with creditworthiness, but that doesn't mean they should be used," Jones said.
When they factor in the web sites that people visit, do you suppose SN would be an asset or liability towards creditworthiness?
[ed note: See also Black Mirror, Season 3 Episode 1, "Nosedive". - fnord]
Janine S. Hiller and Lindsay Sain Jones, Who's Keeping Score?: Oversight of Changing Consumer Credit Infrastructure [open], Am. Bus. Law J., 2022
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2022, @06:26PM (1 child)
stfu, bitch. Those Niggers were probably up there spending Whitey's money to buy food to grow more Niggers anyways. Call it a fucking wake up call for the homo-erectus.
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2022, @09:06PM
If "white replacement theory" is real and it winds up replacing ass-hats like this guy, I will welcome or new black, brown and yellow masters.