Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday November 19 2014, @10:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the doesn't-the-oath-require-the-whole-truth? dept.

In a Baltimore trial courtroom on Monday, a local judge threatened to hold a police detective in contempt of court for refusing to disclose how police located a 16-year-old robbery suspect’s phone.

But rather than disclose the possible use of a Stingray*, also known as a cell site simulator, Detective John L. Haley cited a non-disclosure agreement, likely with a federal law enforcement agency (such as the FBI) and/or the Harris Corporation, since the company is one of the dominant manufacturers of such devices. Stingrays can be used to determine a phone’s location, and they can also intercept calls and text messages.

Baltimore Circuit Judge Barry G. Williams retorted, "You don't have a non-disclosure agreement with the court," according to the Baltimore Sun.

* [Submitter's Note: Surely there's a joke about fishing expeditions to be had there.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by pendorbound on Thursday November 20 2014, @02:32PM

    by pendorbound (2688) on Thursday November 20 2014, @02:32PM (#118111) Homepage

    Has the Federal government co-opted local control of law enforcement?

    Yes.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2