Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday May 19 2022, @05:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the something-to-write-home-about dept.

https://greekreporter.com/2022/04/20/minoan-language-linear-a-linear-b/

The Minoan language known as "Linear A" may finally be deciphered with the help of the internet which can be used to uncover previously-hidden links to the much-better understood Linear B language. Linear B developed later in the prehistoric period.

The puzzle of Linear A has tormented linguists for many decades, as they attempted to link it somehow to Linear B, which was translated successfully for the first time in the 1950s. Linear B was used on the Greek mainland and Crete 50-150 years later than Linear A.

Understanding the link between them and decoding the secrets of Linear A would allow experts to paint a much more complete picture of Minoan civilization going back as far as 1,800 BC.

Linear A, which was used by the Minoans during the Bronze Age, exists on at least 1,400 known inscriptions made on clay tablets. The language has baffled the world's top archaeologists and linguistic experts for many years.

Professor Tim Whitmarsh, the A.G. Leventis Professor of Greek Culture and Fellow of St. John's, had high praise for Salgarella's work and said that "cracking Linear B was a huge post-war triumph for Classics, but Linear A has remained elusive."

"Dr. Salgarella has demonstrated that Linear B is closely related to its mysterious and previously illegible predecessor. She has brought us one step closer to understanding it. It's an extraordinary piece of detective work," praises Whitmarsh.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2022, @07:13PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2022, @07:13PM (#1246365)

    "the prehistoric period" - uh, at the point where we have writing and it's being decyphered, it is literally not prehistoric any more.

    Still, nifty - glad to see ML being leveraged for nerdy good.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2022, @07:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2022, @07:56PM (#1246372)

    Internet experts can go F themselves.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by pTamok on Thursday May 19 2022, @09:04PM (1 child)

    by pTamok (3042) on Thursday May 19 2022, @09:04PM (#1246387)

    "the prehistoric period" - uh, at the point where we have writing and it's being decyphered, it is literally not prehistoric any more.

    Actually, it is. We have the writing, but we have no idea of the date when it was written. History requires accurate dates to give a timeline, so we can determine if events are simultaneous, or what duration separates them. The dates of Ancient Egyptian history are still a subject of much debate. A date of the 7th year of Pharoah doesn't place the date in the context of the Gregorian dating system used today. So it is recorded, but without a Gregorian date. There's a great deal of debate over what the earliest accurately dated human event is - many cite the Battle of Halys [wikipedia.org]"The Battle of the Eclipse", but if you read the linked Wikipedia article, you can see there is much uncertainty about it. Something being recorded doesn't make it history - it needs a date that meshes with our current dating system. Dates posited before certain dates are prehistoric for that part of the world. Prehistory varies by geography - for example, in Papua New Guinea, there are places with no recorded dates before the 20th century.

    We can give estimates for prehistoric dates, which can be as accurate as carbon dating, and relative dates according to a local dating system that isn't connected in some way to the Gregorian calendar can give an idea of the chronology of the period, but we have no way of knowing if a Linear A tablet was written in 1800 BCE, or 1805 BCE, whether it was in March or April, or which day of the month it was written on.

    For an even more in depth view of historical dates and chronology, this unlikely source of somebody's view on the use of the <time> element in HTML [quirksmode.org] outlines the problems. In that author's view, the earliest accurately known date is 300 BC

    300 BC is the earliest year that we can map with complete accuracy; i.e. we can say with certainty that the consulate of M. Valerius Maximus Corvus for the fifth time and Q. Appuleius Pansa occurred exactly 2308 [the article was written in 2009] years before the present time.

    Go far enough away from the present and planetary orbits and their satellites become chaotic, so even astronomical events are clouded with uncertainty - see Fred Espernaks (now hosted by NASA) excellent resources on this, but to quote just one web-page: NASA: Fred Espernak: Eclipse Predictions and Earth's Rotation [nasa.gov]

    The uncertainty in delta-T means that reliable eclipse paths prior to about 1500 BCE are not possible. Similarly, all future values of delta-T are simple extrapolations of current values and trends. Such estimates are prone to growing uncertainty as one extrapolates further and further into the furure[sic]. By the year 3000 CE, the value of delta-T could be on the order of one hour with an extrapolated uncertainty of about ten minutes or several degrees in longitude.

    tl;dr - prehistory varies by geography. At the time Linear A was being written, there are no dates that connect to the currently used Gregorian calendar, so recorded events, even using a local dating system, are outside of the current historical timeline. We simply cannot know when they were written.