Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Friday May 20 2022, @04:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the stuck-on-guard-duty-in-the-Sea-of-Tranquility dept.

U.S. Space Force sees future demand for surveillance beyond Earth orbit

An international race back to the moon is already underway, with the United States, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates all at various stages of planning future lunar missions.

Growing activity in outer space beyond Earth orbit — known as xGEO or cislunar space — could turn this region into a contested domain as countries seek access to lunar resources and stake out areas of jurisdiction. As a result, the U.S. military will likely have to pay more attention to what's happening in xGEO, said Lt. Gen. Stephen Whiting, commander of the U.S. Space Force's Space Operations Command.

"We are now seeing other actors go to the moon, go to lunar orbit and we do need to be concerned and interested in what they are doing there," Whiting said May 16 at a Mitchell Institute event.

Current sensors used by the military for space domain awareness were designed to track satellites in Earth orbits, at distances of 36,000 kilometers or closer, and not for cislunar space which extends out 385,000 kilometers and has different orbital trajectories. Scientists have pointed out that most activities in cislunar space are largely unmonitored and only self-reported.

Whiting noted that keeping watch of Earth orbit alone is "a huge challenge" but nevertheless the military has to prepare to extend its surveillance capabilities.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Friday May 20 2022, @06:13PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday May 20 2022, @06:13PM (#1246647)

    Also, people were a lot more privacy conscious in the past. People actually valued their right to privacy.

    I think that was a technology thing more than conscious choice - you were more private because it cost a lot to expose yourself. Witness: high rise city apartments with open bedroom curtains. That didn't start recently, more like: as soon as there were high rise city apartments.

    I agree there has been an erosion of commonly held ideas of "right to privacy" but I think it's more a matter of the technology allowing people to drop their standards willingly than it is the technology pulling the standards down actively. Your phone number would find its way on to cold-call marketing lists back in the 1960s and 1970s, and people were just about as irate, and impotent, about it back then as they are today. Corporations collected such information on you as they could, and most people didn't object to the free catalogs that would arrive in the mail. It's gotten 1000x more invasive, but that's more because costs to be invasive have dropped than the majority of people dropping their standards of what is worth fighting for.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3