SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the or-at-least-not-be-bothered-either-way dept.
[Ed's Comment: Not wishing to ignite yet another flame war regarding the adoption of systemd, I hesitated before publishing this story. However, although it is not an formal survey, it might still reflect the views of the greater linux user community rather than those who frequent this particular site. There is no need to restate the arguments seen over the last few weeks - they are well known and understood - but the survey might have a point.]
http://q5sys.sh has recenlty conducted a survey finding many Linux users may be in favour of systemd:
First off lets keep one thing in mind, this was not a professional survey. As such the results need to be taken as nothing more than the opinions of the 4755 individuals who responded. While the survey responses show that 47% of the respondents are in favor of systemd, that does not mean that 47% of the overall linux community is in favor of systemd. The actual value may be higher or lower. This is simply a small capture of our overall community.
Although the author questions the results could this be an indication that we're really seeing a vocal minority who don't want systemd while the silent majority either do or simply don't care? Poll results and the original blog post.
(Score: 2) by Marand on Thursday November 20 2014, @11:25PM
If all distros can use systemd and be universal, less time is needed developing init scripts and nuances in booting/configuration. They could use that time on desktop development. Difference in hours spent on systemd vs separate distribution sysvinit systems could be a considerable factor in systemd's value.
There's a fallacy to that statement, but I'm failing to think of the proper name for it. The problem is that the statement is mistakenly treating all developers identically, assuming that every developer is both sufficiently familiar with, and willing to deal with, any part of the system equally. The guys that deal with system services aren't just going to go "okay, nothing to do here, I guess I'll go add a feature to gedit today instead!" Likewise, it's foolish to assume all the desktop devs are qualified to have their fingers in the init system and other underlying bits. (Incidentally, that know-it-all assumption is what keeps getting Poettering and Sievers cursed out by people, like when Sievers demanded Linus change the kernel to accommodate bad behaviour by systemd)
Of course, it's just as likely that the admin types that deal with services are instead getting frustrated by systemd. I wouldn't place any bets on that making them want to spend their time improving the the desktop.