Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday May 31 2022, @11:35AM   Printer-friendly

Nokia CEO says 6G will be here by 2030 — but you might not access it via your smartphone

Headquartered in Finland, Nokia builds telecoms networks that enable phones and other internet-enabled devices to communicate with one another.

Asked when he thinks the world will move away from using smartphones to using smart glasses and other devices that are worn on the face, [Nokia CEO] Lundmark said it will happen before 6G arrives.

[...] "By then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the most common interface," he said. "Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies."

He did not specify exactly what he was referring to but some companies, such as Elon Musk's Neuralink, are working on producing electronic devices that can be implanted into the brain and used for communication with machines and other people. On a more basic level, chips can be implanted into people's fingers and used to unlock things.

6G may be here in the next 8 years or so, but I believe the suggestion of implanted devices being commonplace is a totally unrealistic statement. We have not yet reached the stage where 'implanting things into the brain' has become a simple and low risk proposition. But even if we had, who is going to be performing these operations and at what rate? Who would pay for such medical treatment?

However, let us put these problems aside for a moment. What do you see as the future of personal communications? Let's discuss some realistic or even 'off-the'wall' ideas. What effect would such devices have on our privacy and freedoms? In Star Trek the communicator device, which appeared on our (television) screens around the mid 1960s, does not look too different from some of today's smartphones although at that time it was pure science fiction.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Magic Oddball on Wednesday June 01 2022, @02:30AM

    by Magic Oddball (3847) on Wednesday June 01 2022, @02:30AM (#1249339) Journal

    if you think being dependent on fossil fuels for everything is bad, just wait until landlines become unavailable and the mobile carriers get enough pull inside the clubbermint regulators ...

    It wouldn't matter if landlines became unavailable — it's now fairly rare for a household to have a traditional POTS landline, as the phone companies in much of the US no longer hook them up or activate them when people relocate and have killed off access to oldschool ADSL through their lines. Most people who have a "landline" actually just have a VOIP line as part of their Internet service package, and primarily (if not entirely) rely on their personal cellphones for phone service.

    Also, using made-up derogatory terms like "clubbermint" makes you sound too immature or irrational to take seriously.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2