SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Ad-block developers fear end is near for their extensions:
Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.
Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.
The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.
Browser extensions such as Ghostery Privacy Ad Blocker, uBlock Origin, and Privacy Badger, along with scripting extensions including TamperMonkey, which are each designed to block adverts and other content and/or protect one's privacy online, are expected to function less effectively, if they can even make the transition from Mv2 to the new approach: Manifest v3.
"If you asked me if we can have a Manifest v3 version of Privacy Badger, my answer is yes, we can and we will," said Alexei Miagkov, senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, in a phone interview with The Register. "But the problem is more insidious. It's that Manifest v3 caps the certain capabilities of extensions and cuts off innovation potential."
Google argues otherwise and maintains its platform renovation will meet developers' needs, including those making tools for content blocking and privacy. The internet titan, which declined to comment on the record, maintains that Mv3 aims to improve privacy by limiting extensions' access to sensitive data and that it has been working with extension developers to balance their needs with those of users.
Google points to past endorsements, such as remarks provided by Sofia Lindberg, tech lead of ad amelioration biz Eyeo, which makes Adblock Plus. "We've been very pleased with the close collaboration established between Google's Chrome Extensions Team and our own engineering team to ensure that ad-blocking extensions will still be available after Manifest v3 takes effect."
[...] Google began work on Manifest v3, the successor to Mv2, in late 2018, ostensibly to make extensions more secure, performant, and private. The company's extension platform renovation was necessary – because extension security problems were rampant – and immediately controversial. An ad company making security claims that, coincidentally, hinder user-deployed content and privacy defenses looks like self-interest.
And Mv3 remains the subject of ongoing debate as the extension platform capabilities and APIs continue to be hammered out. But it has been adopted, with some caveats, by other browser makers, including Apple and Mozilla. Makers of Chromium-based browsers inherit Mv3 and Microsoft has already endorsed the new spec.
Others building atop Chromium like Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi have indicated interest in continuing to support Mv2, though it's unclear whether that will be practical beyond June of next year. If Google removes the Mv2 code from Chromium, maintaining the code in a separate Chromium fork may prove to be too much trouble.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 10 2022, @11:36AM (9 children)
Hopefully. But Firefox supports ad blocking on Android, and Chrome doesn't. Yet Firefox has something like 0.5% market share.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 10 2022, @12:28PM (5 children)
Yeah. Most people stick with the defaults. Google is going to get away with this because they already won. Chrome is the standard, it seems impossible to dethrone. I would love to be wrong.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 10 2022, @12:35PM (4 children)
IE once confidently occupied that throne too.
(Score: 2) by unauthorized on Friday June 10 2022, @01:19PM (2 children)
Yes, they were dethroned by the world's most popular search engine shilling their browser. I doubt they're going to shill Firefox or Brave.
(Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Friday June 10 2022, @02:14PM
They were already losing big to Firefox when Chrome came.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Friday June 10 2022, @03:33PM
I hate to break it to you but Brave is Chrome. I stay religiously away from Brave for that reason alone.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 10 2022, @03:26PM
So did Netscape.
(Score: 2) by Opportunist on Friday June 10 2022, @12:43PM (2 children)
Who wants to visit websites on a stamp-sized screen?
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 10 2022, @12:48PM (1 child)
People who don't want to drag a full-size computer around with them all day?
(Score: 4, Insightful) by captain normal on Friday June 10 2022, @01:49PM
If you feel you have to be online 24/7 you have other problems besides blocking on screen ads.
"It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they have been fooled" Mark Twain