Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Suggestions for Init System Features?

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday November 23 2014, @01:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the first-do-no-harm dept.

Subsentient writes:

I am the maintainer of the Epoch Init System, a single threaded Linux init system with non-intrusiveness in mind, and I'm preparing to release 2.0. It's mostly a code cleanup release, but while I'm at it, I thought I'd ask the Soylent community what features they'd like to see. I'm open to all good ideas, but I'm wary of feature creep, so as a result, I won't consider the following:

* multithreaded/parallel services, because that goes against design goals of simplicity and harms customizability
* mounting support or networking support; it's an init system, use busybox if you need a mount command.

So what do soylentils want to see in the next release of the Epoch Init System?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Suggestions for Init System Features? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 50 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 1) by rleigh on Sunday November 23 2014, @03:01PM

    by rleigh (4887) on Sunday November 23 2014, @03:01PM (#119116) Homepage

    If you haven't already taken a look, I'd certainly highly recommend taking a look at s6 http://skarnet.org/software/s6/ [skarnet.org] for inspiration. This takes "do one thing, and do it well" to its conclusion and the result is about as small and robust as you can get for the basic init functionality. The concepts used in s6 are good, and could be reused in other init systems.