Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 22 2022, @01:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-you-change-your-mind-I'm-the-first-in-line dept.

Science reporting on climate change does lead Americans to adopt more accurate beliefs and support government action on the issue—but these gains are fragile, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that these accurate beliefs fade quickly and can erode when people are exposed to coverage skeptical of climate change.

"It is not the case that the American public does not respond to scientifically informed reporting when they are exposed to it," said Thomas Wood, associate professor of political science at The Ohio State University.

"But even factually accurate science reporting recedes from people's frame of reference very quickly."

"Not only did science reporting change people's factual understanding, it also moved their political preferences," he said. "It made them think that climate change was a pressing government concern that government should do more about."

[...] Overall, the results suggest that the media play a key role in Americans' beliefs and attitudes about scientific issues like climate change.

"It was striking to us how amenable the subjects in our study were to what they read about climate change in our study. But what they learned faded very quickly," Wood said. The results of the study conflict with the media imperative to only report on what is new.

More information: Time and skeptical opinion content erode the effects of science coverage on climate beliefs and attitudes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122069119.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 23 2022, @08:28AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 23 2022, @08:28AM (#1255542)

    I suggest that SoylentNews, as a community, volunteer khallow for this experiment. I trust it involves electrodes inserted into the skull? If it works on khallow, it will work on anyone. Never seen such a stubborn twit. And he thinks he is smart, with "evidence" and shit.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday June 23 2022, @11:29AM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 23 2022, @11:29AM (#1255557) Journal

    Never seen such a stubborn twit. And he thinks he is smart, with "evidence" and shit.

    That's science, Buttercup. Without "evidence" you have shit. It doesn't matter how much you talk up consensus or the latest bit of extreme weather.

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 24 2022, @05:34AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 24 2022, @05:34AM (#1255743)

      I never suggested that khallow would be a willing subject, quite the opposite. Black vans and bags over the head type stuff, like that movie about the Marlbourgh man.