SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Wild solar weather is causing satellites to plummet from orbit. It's only going to get worse.:
In late 2021, operators of the European Space Agency's (ESA) Swarm constellation noticed something worrying: The satellites, which measure the magnetic field around Earth, started sinking toward the atmosphere at an unusually fast rate — up to 10 times faster than before. The change coincided with the onset of the new solar cycle, and experts think it might be the beginning of some difficult years for spacecraft orbiting our planet.
"In the last five, six years, the satellites were sinking about two and a half kilometers [1.5 miles] a year," Anja Stromme, ESA's Swarm mission manager, told Space.com. "But since December last year, they have been virtually diving. The sink rate between December and April has been 20 kilometers [12 miles] per year."
Satellites orbiting close to Earth always face the drag of the residual atmosphere, which gradually slows the spacecraft and eventually makes them fall back to the planet. (They usually don't survive this so-called re-entry and burn up in the atmosphere.) This atmospheric drag forces the International Space Station's controllers to perform regular "reboost" maneuvers to maintain the station's orbit of 250 miles (400 km) above Earth.
This drag also helps clean up the near-Earth environment from space junk. Scientists know that the intensity of this drag depends on solar activity — the amount of solar wind spewed by the sun, which varies depending on the 11-year solar cycle. The last cycle, which officially ended in December 2019, was rather sleepy, with a below-average number of monthly sunspots and a prolonged minimum of barely any activity. But since last fall, the star has been waking up, spewing more and more solar wind and generating sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections at a growing rate. And the Earth's upper atmosphere has felt the effects.
"There is a lot of complex physics that we still don't fully understand going on in the upper layers of the atmosphere where it interacts with the solar wind," Stromme said. "We know that this interaction causes an upwelling of the atmosphere. That means that the denser air shifts upwards to higher altitudes."
Denser air means higher drag for the satellites. Even though this density is still incredibly low 250 miles above Earth, the increase caused by the upwelling atmosphere is enough to virtually send some of the low-orbiting satellites plummeting.
"It's almost like running with the wind against you," Stromme said. "It's harder, it's drag — so it slows the satellites down, and when they slow down, they sink."
[...] "Generally speaking, increasing solar activity — and its effect on the upper atmosphere — is good news from a space debris perspective, as it reduces orbital lifetimes of the debris and provides a useful 'cleaning service,'" Lewis said.
According to Jonathan McDowell, a space debris expert at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the positive effect can already be observed, as fragments produced by the November 2021 Russian anti-satellite missile test are now coming down much faster than before.
However, there is a downside to this cleansing process.
"The increased rate of decay of debris objects can be perceived almost like rain," Lewis said. "When solar activity is high, the 'rain' rate is higher, and missions at lower altitudes will potentially experience a greater flux of debris." A greater flux of debris means the need for even more frequent fuel-burning avoidance maneuvers and a temporarily increased risk of collisions, which could potentially generate more dangerous fragments.
(Score: 0, Offtopic) by DannyB on Sunday June 26 2022, @01:24AM (13 children)
Don't worry there will be an end to fossil fuels. There is only so much. It is already getting harder and harder to find. It becomes more and more difficult to extract -- and more expensive. More technology will be needed to extract it over time.
Which will happen first?
[_] fossil fuels run out
[x] human race extinct
[_] Republicans consider the good of human kind above profits
[_] Other (please specify in comments)
Which would you rather have?
[x] full frontal lobotomy
[_] full bottle in front of me
[_] Other (please specify in comments)
If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
(Score: 0, Offtopic) by Runaway1956 on Sunday June 26 2022, @02:20AM (7 children)
This is why we need to go into space. We need to import more hydrocarbons to burn!
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Sunday June 26 2022, @02:28AM (2 children)
We could try mining asteroids for "rare earth" metals.
Somehow all of our rare earth metals ended up under China's land. And all our oil ended up under the sands in the Middle East.
If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
(Score: 4, Touché) by Snotnose on Sunday June 26 2022, @03:15PM
Not true. Rare earth metals are all over the place. But mining them is an environmental disaster, something China doesn't care about.
Relationship status: Available for curbside pickup.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by drussell on Sunday June 26 2022, @03:20PM
"Rare earth metals" actually aren't that rare, and they most certainly aren't all "under China."
China's dominance in the supply of these elements didn't really start until the late '80s and in through the '90s when they undercut the prices of the existing worldwide supplies, making it "uneconomical" for the mines elsewhere to continue operating when China would do it "cheaper" with their poorly paid miners in dangerous, messy mines. They have, of course, much less in the way of safety and environmental protection requirements than most of the rest of the world requires, so can sell the stuff on the cheap.
People elsewhere are waking up to the fact that China having a near-monopoly on much of the "rare earth" supply is probably not such a good thing, especially since they are likely to wield supply "availability to others" like a big stick. Other countries, especially ones which already have shuttered former rare earth mines, are beginning to start or restart operations and exploration for other future reasonably-easily-exploitable deposits has begun in many places.
The Mountain Pass Mine in California for example, which is the US's only rare-earth mine, has started winding production back up in recent years, supplying 16% of the world's supply in 2020, which is a considerable portion of the non-China production since China is currently responsible for about 81% of the yearly global supply. There is also supposedly a project underway to start a mine in Alaska.
South Africa's Steenkampskraal mine, which has the world's highest quality ore of any existing exploited deposit, has supposedly currently got >80% of the infrastructure in place to restart production, but I don't know what the planned restart date is for actual production.
Canada has a few small rare-earth mining operations and I know work is underway on expanding the operations up north of Uranium City at the Hoidas Lake facility. Australia is ramping up production at the Mount Weld mine (deposit discovered in 1988, first bits of production started in 2011,) and I believe the permitting is complete for the Nolans project in Central Australia, but I don't know an expected time-frame for the start of production. Various other countries are also ramping up planning and production at other known deposits.
China's monopoly on the rare-earth supplies is coming to an end, but it is going to be a long, slow process.
(Score: 0, Disagree) by Some call me Tim on Sunday June 26 2022, @02:40AM (3 children)
The US has more than we need to supply us and the rest of the world. Two years ago we were energy independent for the first time in our history. Then along came Biden. All he had to do was nothing and we would have been fine. He undid everything Trump and now we have $6.00 a gallon gas. FJB!
Questioning science is how you do science!
(Score: 4, Insightful) by drussell on Sunday June 26 2022, @03:24PM (1 child)
So it is Biden's fault that the rest of the world has sky-high energy prices too? Riiiight....
You're being obtuse.
Gas prices would still be insane if Trump were currently still president, but half of the planet would probably be on fire too. ;)
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2022, @06:07PM
The important difference is that if Trump were president, the high gas prices would clearly be Putin's fault. Since this is not the case clearly it is Biden's fault for getting elected.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by bloodnok on Sunday June 26 2022, @04:16PM
Actually, no. Testing science is how you do science.
Questioning, particularly in the tone that is commonly used these days, is often simply an attack on something that you disagree with. Asking the same question that the scientists started with: "is the climate being affected by human-caused carbon emissions?", does nothing to advance science; it simply attempts to reset the discussion to before the question was considered, analysed, modelled, tested and answered. It attempts to undermine the science by subtly implying that the question has not been properly considered.
Good questioning, if you are prepared to listen and try to understand the answer, may help educate the questioner but does nothing to further our collective understanding.
This has been a public service announcement.
__
The major
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 26 2022, @03:31AM (1 child)
"There is a lot of complex physics that we still don't fully understand going on in the upper layers of the atmosphere where it interacts with the solar wind,"
Your reaction to the admission that the touted models of doom on which current anti-western environmental policies are justified are flawed tells me you're either quite dumb or have an agenda.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 26 2022, @08:28AM
It is "both", not "either".
(Score: 2) by captain normal on Sunday June 26 2022, @03:56AM (2 children)
Is this a poll?
"It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they have been fooled" Mark Twain
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Sunday June 26 2022, @11:54AM
Maybe it should be. Perhaps two polls.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday June 29 2022, @02:24PM
A poll without a poll dancer.
If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious