Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday June 26 2022, @12:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the chicken-little dept.

Wild solar weather is causing satellites to plummet from orbit. It's only going to get worse.:

In late 2021, operators of the European Space Agency's (ESA) Swarm constellation noticed something worrying: The satellites, which measure the magnetic field around Earth, started sinking toward the atmosphere at an unusually fast rate — up to 10 times faster than before. The change coincided with the onset of the new solar cycle, and experts think it might be the beginning of some difficult years for spacecraft orbiting our planet.

"In the last five, six years, the satellites were sinking about two and a half kilometers [1.5 miles] a year," Anja Stromme, ESA's Swarm mission manager, told Space.com. "But since December last year, they have been virtually diving. The sink rate between December and April has been 20 kilometers [12 miles] per year."

Satellites orbiting close to Earth always face the drag of the residual atmosphere, which gradually slows the spacecraft and eventually makes them fall back to the planet. (They usually don't survive this so-called re-entry and burn up in the atmosphere.) This atmospheric drag forces the International Space Station's controllers to perform regular "reboost" maneuvers to maintain the station's orbit of 250 miles (400 km) above Earth.

This drag also helps clean up the near-Earth environment from space junk. Scientists know that the intensity of this drag depends on solar activity — the amount of solar wind spewed by the sun, which varies depending on the 11-year solar cycle. The last cycle, which officially ended in December 2019, was rather sleepy, with a below-average number of monthly sunspots and a prolonged minimum of barely any activity. But since last fall, the star has been waking up, spewing more and more solar wind and generating sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections at a growing rate. And the Earth's upper atmosphere has felt the effects.

"There is a lot of complex physics that we still don't fully understand going on in the upper layers of the atmosphere where it interacts with the solar wind," Stromme said. "We know that this interaction causes an upwelling of the atmosphere. That means that the denser air shifts upwards to higher altitudes."

Denser air means higher drag for the satellites. Even though this density is still incredibly low 250 miles above Earth, the increase caused by the upwelling atmosphere is enough to virtually send some of the low-orbiting satellites plummeting.

"It's almost like running with the wind against you," Stromme said. "It's harder, it's drag — so it slows the satellites down, and when they slow down, they sink."

[...] "Generally speaking, increasing solar activity — and its effect on the upper atmosphere — is good news from a space debris perspective, as it reduces orbital lifetimes of the debris and provides a useful 'cleaning service,'" Lewis said.

According to Jonathan McDowell, a space debris expert at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the positive effect can already be observed, as fragments produced by the November 2021 Russian anti-satellite missile test are now coming down much faster than before.

However, there is a downside to this cleansing process.

"The increased rate of decay of debris objects can be perceived almost like rain," Lewis said. "When solar activity is high, the 'rain' rate is higher, and missions at lower altitudes will potentially experience a greater flux of debris." A greater flux of debris means the need for even more frequent fuel-burning avoidance maneuvers and a temporarily increased risk of collisions, which could potentially generate more dangerous fragments.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by dalek on Sunday June 26 2022, @02:52PM

    by dalek (15489) on Sunday June 26 2022, @02:52PM (#1256315) Journal

    The New York Times explanation doesn't really do a great job of explaining the relevant physical processes. I linked to it because it addresses the issue of atmospheric drag and linked to the full text [wiley.com] of the relevant study. If you're looking for a good explanation of the mechanism that causes increased CO2 to cool the upper atmosphere, I recommend this article [cosmosmagazine.com].

    Unlike most of the gases in the atmosphere, CO2 absorbs some radiation in infrared wavelengths. CO2 efficiently absorbs these wavelengths, but also efficiently radiates heat. It means that when a CO2 molecule absorbs heat, the molecule will quickly radiate that heat again. The lower atmosphere is dense enough that CO2 molecules frequently collide with molecules of other cases (e.g., molecular nitrogen or molecular oxygen) that don't radiate heat as efficiently as CO2 does. Much of the kinetic energy gets transferred to other gas molecules before the CO2 radiates the energy as heat.

    The upper atmosphere is sufficiently thin that even with the very high temperatures (600-3000 K) in the thermosphere, CO2 molecules are much less likely to collide with other gas molecules prior to radiating the heat. CO2 radiates heat more efficiently than other gases in the upper atmosphere, meaning that heat absorbed by CO2 is quickly lost either back into the lower atmosphere or out to space.

    It's not that CO2 molecules somehow behave differently in the lower atmosphere versus the upper atmosphere. The difference is that CO2 molecules in the lower atmosphere are much more likely to collide with other gas molecules and transfer kinetic energy than they are in the upper atmosphere.

    I'm by far most familiar with processes that take place mostly in the troposphere. The description of the process in the New York Times article wasn't particularly satisfying to me. However, the mechanism described in the second article, which I've paraphrased in my comment, does make sense to me.

    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest just whinge about SN.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5