Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 6 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Thursday March 06 2014, @09:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the I'll-show-you-mine-if-you-show-me-yours dept.

Detective_Thorn writes:

"In a recent study published by the Academy of Management Journal, Prof. Peter Bamberger of Tel Aviv University's Recanati School of Business and Dr. Elena Belogolovsky of Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations have published a study that explains why pay secrecy is likely to hurt an individual's work performance and prompt top talent to seek new employment. They conclude that pay secrecy weakens the perception by employees that a performance improvement will be accompanied by a pay increase. It also finds that high-performing workers are more sensitive than others when they perceive no link between performance and pay; suggesting that pay secrecy could limit a company's ability to retain top talent."

So who, if anybody, benefits from pay secrecy?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by ikanreed on Thursday March 06 2014, @09:19PM

    by ikanreed (3164) on Thursday March 06 2014, @09:19PM (#12217) Journal

    If you can keep from paying your employees well, you can claim a greater percentage of their productivity for yourself. Who cares what the net effect is on the long-term viability of the company?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1) by Buck Feta on Thursday March 06 2014, @10:16PM

    by Buck Feta (958) on Thursday March 06 2014, @10:16PM (#12250) Journal

    While this is arguably a viable strategy, it is not the only strategy used by employers. There are many companies which aim to offer top salaries and/or benefits packages in their sector. I offer Starbucks (benefits), Chipotle (internal promotion), and Costco (pay rate) as examples of companies which have consciously chosen this path.

    - fractious political commentary goes here -
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by hopdevil on Thursday March 06 2014, @10:20PM

    by hopdevil (3356) on Thursday March 06 2014, @10:20PM (#12252)

    Despite all common sense, it's better to maximize performance/profits from your employees without regard to their happiness. In fact it could easily be argued that not paying your employees well is best for the company. Exploiting people (workers) is what this game is all about.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by germanbird on Thursday March 06 2014, @10:57PM

      by germanbird (2619) on Thursday March 06 2014, @10:57PM (#12283)

      True, but that is a fine line to walk. Keep your salaries too low and your employees will quickly look for jobs elsewhere. Also, I am much more likely to go above and beyond for an employer that is going above and beyond for me. So I believe, in some ways, taking care of your employees is taking care of the company.

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Nerdfest on Friday March 07 2014, @01:05AM

        by Nerdfest (80) on Friday March 07 2014, @01:05AM (#12366)

        It sounds like he's describing the current short-term "MBA driven" approach.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by mojo chan on Friday March 07 2014, @12:07PM

      by mojo chan (266) on Friday March 07 2014, @12:07PM (#12612)

      Japan has the largest number of long running companies (75+ years) in the world. That includes both large and small companies. They treat their employees very well. Western investors often undervalue them due to high wage costs and staff benefits, but Japanese companies count people as an asset.

      If a company wants to be around in 50 years time it should value its employees. If the CEO just wants to get rich quick and then get out exploitation is the name of the game. From an employee's point of view a company that treats them badly is likely to fail anyway, so might as well look for something better right away.

      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)