Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Sunday July 10 2022, @10:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-good-news-for-radio-shack dept.

They say it's because of audio quality, but it isn't that simple:

It's easy to take for granted amenities in our cars like air conditioning and the radio, which have been standard equipment for longer than many of us have been alive. But the rise of electric vehicles is giving the auto industry the chance to rethink norms and jettison ideas that belong in the past. One of those ideas may be AM radios, which some carmakers say they won't include on future EVs, and which are already unavailable on a few. Car companies blame interference from EVs' drivetrains, but the answer isn't that simple—not by a long shot.

[....] EVs from Audi, BMW, Porsche, Tesla, and Volvo are sold without AM radios, and it's been that way for years.

[....] So are highly complex EVs incompatible with one of the oldest, simplest electronics? BMW and Volvo told me it was due to audio quality problems rooted in electromagnetic interference, of which EVs' drivetrains produce a significant amount. Cars' engines and other complex electronics have always made EM interference, but low-wattage static is relatively easy to shield against. It's not as simple with EVs that may pull hundreds of watts from their batteries

[....] But it's hard to take them at their word when EVs are built with AM radios and in no small numbers. Detroit's Three—Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis—have produced or currently make EVs that include AM radio

Can radio be an addiction? I suppose it depends on the frequency.

Will the FCC cry foul if there is interference? Only if the batter hinders the catcher after a third strike.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by Mykl on Monday July 11 2022, @05:13AM (4 children)

    by Mykl (1112) on Monday July 11 2022, @05:13AM (#1259660)

    Agree, but it's a pretty narrow edge case. I doubt that the Venn diagram of Tesla owners and Survival Preppers has a large overlap.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Rich on Monday July 11 2022, @11:36AM

    by Rich (945) on Monday July 11 2022, @11:36AM (#1259727) Journal

    Well, the Cybertruck might be a sensible choice for the Mad Max III scenario, where the primary energy source is biogas generated electricity. At least as long as the batteries last. Long term choice would be a VW Golf 1 Diesel which runs on about everything that resembles oil - and also has an AM radio if it comes in original condition!

  • (Score: 2) by ElizabethGreene on Monday July 11 2022, @03:15PM (2 children)

    by ElizabethGreene (6748) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 11 2022, @03:15PM (#1259793) Journal

    I doubt that the Venn diagram of Tesla owners and Survival Preppers has a large overlap.

    That's a real shame. It's a pain in the Heineken to make your own Gasoline or Diesel, compared to charging your Tesla off a grid tie or grid independent solar array. You can save the planet and be ready for just in case too.

    To go ahead and cover what you'll say next: "But what about an EMP?" Good question. We don't have data for EVs. When USGOV tested non-ev cars in a simulated EMP, all were fine after a reboot. That testing stopped in 2002.

    As a prepper, I'm uncomfortable with Tesla's skynet/big brother OTA update system, but that's not unique to Tesla. It's in most major cars now. They collect enough telemetry to make Microsoft blush.