Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday July 18 2022, @12:01PM   Printer-friendly

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

Organ transplant recipients take life-long immunosuppressive drugs to prevent their bodies from mounting an immune response against the donated organ, yet a substantial number of them still reject the organs. A new study by researchers from the University of Chicago shows that transplant recipients also mount an immune response against commensal bacteria in the organ graft, adding to the immune response against the genetic makeup of the tissue and reducing the effectiveness of immunosuppressive drugs.

The study, published today in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, also shows that this anti-microbial immune response can be triggered by immune cell memory of previous encounters with bacteria, further complicating the body's ability to accept a lifesaving new organ.

"Before, we thought the reason why transplanted organs in humans are less easily accepted than in sheltered laboratory animals is that humans can have immune memory responses that cross-react on the cells of the organ, and memory responses are more difficult to suppress with drugs than naïve responses," said Maria-Luisa Alegre, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine at UChicago and senior author of the study. "Now, we see that it's not only memory cells that recognize the organ itself that are the problem, but also memory responses that recognize bacteria in the organ."

The success of organ transplants depends on the type of organ. Lungs and small intestines are notoriously difficult to transplant and have shorter survival times. Statistics show that within five years of surgery, 41% of lung and 54% of intestinal transplant recipients rejected their grafts, compared to organs like kidneys (just 27% rejection) and hearts (23%). One hypothesis was that lungs and intestines, but not kidneys and hearts, are exposed to microbes from the air and digestive system and that the organ recipients were mounting immune responses not only to the organs but also to the microbes in those organs.

[...] Most importantly, when they transplanted mice with skin grafts that were genetically different and colonized with bacteria -- simulating the scenario like most human organ transplants -- they saw that immunosuppressive drugs that prolonged transplant survival in naïve mice did not work in mice with anti-bacterial memory.

"That explains why when you transplant a lung or intestine, patients do less well and have to receive higher levels of immunosuppression than when you transplant sterile organs," Alegre said. "You have to deal not only with the response against the graft, but also the response against the bacteria that come with the graft."


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 18 2022, @03:40PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 18 2022, @03:40PM (#1261567)

    And there have been lots of people claiming various things in the human body was sterile. Urine etc.

    Personally I suspect for most people there's bacteria and maybe fungi everywhere. Just mostly "under control" and not huge amounts everywhere (maybe huge amounts in certain parts of the digestive system).

    Most people have mites too ( https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/05/21/725087824/meet-the-mites-that-live-on-your-face [npr.org] ). The more you look closely and thoroughly the less sterile stuff is.

    • (Score: 1, Redundant) by EvilSS on Monday July 18 2022, @03:44PM (2 children)

      by EvilSS (1456) on Monday July 18 2022, @03:44PM (#1261570)
      Literally in the summary: "Statistics show that within five years of surgery, 41% of lung and 54% of intestinal transplant recipients rejected their grafts, compared to organs like kidneys (just 27% rejection) and hearts (23%). One hypothesis was that lungs and intestines, but not kidneys and hearts, are exposed to microbes from the air and digestive system and that the organ recipients were mounting immune responses not only to the organs but also to the microbes in those organs."

      I doubt anyone with any sense is claiming lungs and intestines are sterile.
      • (Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 18 2022, @03:51PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 18 2022, @03:51PM (#1261576)
        I doubt anyone with any sense is claiming that people are claiming that lungs and intestines are sterile... ;)
        • (Score: 2) by EvilSS on Monday July 18 2022, @04:13PM

          by EvilSS (1456) on Monday July 18 2022, @04:13PM (#1261582)
          It was implied by the AC I responded to. Otherwise, why bring it up in relation to an article clearly differentiating between organs that are expected to contain bacteria, and those that are not?
(1)