Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Wednesday July 27 2022, @10:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the cause-I'm-a-Google-child dept.

Google's Finally Ready to Give Us Google Glass 2, but is the World Ready?

Google Glass is making a comeback:

Seven years after discontinuing the Google Glass prototype and pivoting towards business-exclusive applications, it appears that the Californian tech giant is finally ready to give consumer-focused AR tech another chance.

In an official blog post, Google announced that it would soon start publicly testing prototypes for its upcoming Google AR devices, which will focus on live translation and navigation features.

Rumors that Google is developing new AR glasses have been swirling for a while, and in one low-key swoop, it has officially confirmed they were true all along. While lacking a lot of the excitement we would have expected for such an announcement, this is a smart tactical move for Google.

[...] Even if Google is testing a single unified prototype it could face the return of an old enemy – public fear. While Google promises that its latest AR devices are restricted on how they can use their cameras and microphones, that likely won't assuage people's concerns.

[...] We'll have to wait and see how the general public reacts though, not only next month when testers start walking around with the prototypes but also when they officially launch. Another big fault of the original Google Glass was its tough-to-swallow $1,500 price tag. Given the current economic hardships many people are facing right now, a similarly expensive product could once again be doomed to fail.

Ready or Not, the Glassholes are Coming Back

Is the world finally prepared for hands-free cameras?:

Every major tech company is working on computer glasses. None of them really want to go first.

They all remember how Google Glass, and the "Glassholes" who wore them in public, became the laughingstock of the world. So they've been waiting, biding their time, refining their prototypes, and every so often making sure investors know that, no, they're not going to let the first potentially iPhone-sized opportunity since the iPhone slip by.

[...] If you hate this idea, there's probably nothing I can say to convince you otherwise, nor would I necessarily want to; I'm not going to pretend to know whether such a gadget should exist in the world. I just think you should realize that if Google's test doesn't end in utter disgust, it won't be long before Apple, Microsoft, and others throw their long-awaited glasses into the ring as well.

And in 2022, I wouldn't actually bet on disgust, mainly because we've had a decade of pointing phones at things in public, documenting every element of our lives, to prepare us for what's to come.

[...] Sure, that could change if a future pair of glasses proves to be more intrusive than our existing phones and drones. There are definitely going to be serious questions about data collection and privacy, particularly given the track record of some of the companies building them.

But in 2022, I think the bigger challenge facing Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Snap is figuring out how to build AR experiences we'd actually pay for — experiences more compelling or convenient than what phones already offer.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Booga1 on Thursday July 28 2022, @02:14AM (2 children)

    by Booga1 (6333) on Thursday July 28 2022, @02:14AM (#1263366)

    if you could run the software on a local server.

    They could design it to store and process everything locally on your phone. It's got the local storage and compute power needed. The thing is, they won't do that. They won't do it because that isn't what these devices are for. They're data collection devices. They promise they'll have limited use of the cameras and microphones, but they've overstepped their boundaries in the past so many times that we know they can't be trusted. They can't resist the sweet mountain of data this thing will produce. It's just too tempting.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by helel on Thursday July 28 2022, @06:46AM

    by helel (2949) on Thursday July 28 2022, @06:46AM (#1263386)

    Apple does allot of processing on their phone, both for itself and for the Apple Watch. Chances are this will be no different than the current options - Everyone does everything in the cloud except apple who works locally and then uploads it to the cloud unless you turn that feature off...

  • (Score: 4, Funny) by DannyB on Thursday July 28 2022, @02:40PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 28 2022, @02:40PM (#1263427) Journal

    They promise they'll have limited use of the cameras and microphones, but [ . . . ] They can't resist the sweet mountain of data

    Google would never be evil. Thus they will not abuse this access to cameras and mics. I know this because they said so. They would not lie because that would be evil. They said they are not evil. Q.E.D.

    --
    Never fear, Smith is here.