Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday November 29 2014, @03:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the old-school-hacking dept.

I ran across this article from last year again and it got me thinking. The article is a story about how a hardware hacker was able to hack hard drive firmware, first to upload his own firmware, but also to take advantage of the embedded controller, and even install linux on the controller. If you haven't read it it's fairly impressive. [Ed's Comment: I would go further and say that it is a amazing piece of hacking, in the traditional meaning of the word.]

It seems that lately there have been a lot of vulnerabilities targeting embedded peripherals. Those in the article come to mind, also badUSB, and some IPMI vulnerabilities.

What do you think? Are the number of attack vectors targeting embedded peripherals a consequence of more powerful controllers? Worse software? More sophisticated attackers? Or just a random occurrence?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Immerman on Saturday November 29 2014, @08:10PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Saturday November 29 2014, @08:10PM (#121160)

    You could get even trickier: Take a 4GB drive and slap a 1GB sticker on it, and have the custom firmware report sizes accordingly. BAM! 3TB of completely invisible storage capacity that could be selectively mapped onto the visible 1TB when the proper secret handshake is provided.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by maxwell demon on Saturday November 29 2014, @09:19PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Saturday November 29 2014, @09:19PM (#121166) Journal

    I'd really be interested in the firmware update that can upgrade a 4GB drive to 4TB. That could save a lot of money when buying hard disks. ;-)

    On a more serious note: When replacing the sticker, you risk generating a drive that doesn't look right (if the drive you label it as looks slightly different than the one you relabel).

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Sunday November 30 2014, @03:04PM

      by Immerman (3985) on Sunday November 30 2014, @03:04PM (#121279)

      Damn, how'd that slip through?

      And yes, you are correct - but how many investigators are likely to notice the visual anomalies? I'm guessing looking at photo studies of the drive the label is from isn't part of the normal data extraction process. Especially if you throw a decoy Truecrypt volume on the visible portion to throw them off the track.

      And if you could find a family of drives where the case/controller board/etc. are basically the same for several capacities, with only a few controller parameters tweaked to match the platters, then you could eliminate virtually all evidence. Unless they swapped the controller board itself out of general suspicion there'd be no way to tell anything was wrong.

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by frojack on Saturday November 29 2014, @10:46PM

    by frojack (1554) Subscriber Badge on Saturday November 29 2014, @10:46PM (#121180) Journal

    Well, if you can make a 3TB drive from a 4GB drive you're already ahead of the game.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 2) by pixeldyne on Sunday November 30 2014, @10:46PM

    by pixeldyne (2637) on Sunday November 30 2014, @10:46PM (#121344)

    That is a good idea but you'd also need to fake a new serial and product number, otherwise that would give it away. I don't think an investigator would bother with the label?