Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday November 30 2014, @01:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the rent-seeking dept.

Most major American cities have long used a system to limit the number of operating taxicabs, typically a medallion system: Drivers must own or rent a medallion to operate a taxi, and the city issues a fixed number of them. Now Josh Barro reports at the NYT that in major cities throughout the United States, taxi medallion prices are tumbling as taxis face competition from car-service apps like Uber and Lyft. The average price of an individual New York City taxi medallion fell to $872,000 in October, down 17 percent from a peak reached in the spring of 2013, according to an analysis of sales data. "I’m already at peace with the idea that I’m going to go bankrupt,” said Larry Ionescu, who owns 98 Chicago taxi medallions. As recently as April, Boston taxi medallions were selling for $700,000. The last sale, in October, was for $561,000. “Right now Uber has a strong presence here in Boston, and that’s having a dramatic impact on the taxi industry and the medallion values,” says Donna Blythe-Shaw, a spokeswoman for the Boston Taxi Drivers’ Association. “We hear that there’s a couple of medallion owners that have offered to sell at 425 and nobody’s touched them."

The current structure of the American taxi industry began in New York City when “taxi medallions” were introduced in the 1930s. Taxis were extremely popular in the city, and the government realized they needed to make sure drivers weren’t psychopaths luring victims into their cars. So, New York City required cabbies to apply for a taxi medallion license. Given the technology available in the 1930s, It was a reasonable solution to the taxi safety problem, and other cities soon followed suit. But their scarcity has made taxi medallions the best investment in America for years. Where they exist, taxi medallions have outperformed even the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. In Chicago, their value has doubled since 2009. The medallion stakeholders are many and deep pockets run this market. The system in Chicago and elsewhere is dominated by large investors who rely on brokers to sell medallions, specialty banks to finance them and middle men to manage and lease them to drivers who own nothing at all. Together, they’re fighting to protect an asset that was worth about $2.4 billion in Chicago last year. “The medallion owners seem to be of the opinion that they are entitled to indefinite appreciation of their asset,” says Corey ­Owens, Uber’s head of global public policy.. “The taxi medallion in the U.S. was the best investment you could have made in the last 30 years. Will it go up forever? No. And if they expected that it would, that was their mistake.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by tonyPick on Sunday November 30 2014, @03:45PM

    by tonyPick (1237) on Sunday November 30 2014, @03:45PM (#121284) Homepage Journal

    The quote in the summary is from the priceonomics blog. Whilst the quote is alarmist there were some valid arguments for the Medallion system, as enforced by the Haas act, at the time though (other than "aggrandizing the power of the regulators and enabling those they favor to make rents", of course):

    http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/11/nyregion/medallion-limits-stem-from-the-30-s.html [nytimes.com]
    http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/taxi-cab-medallions-uber-and-the-transitional-gains-trap-part-1/ [politicalentrepreneurs.com]
    http://www.schallerconsult.com/taxi/taxi2.htm [schallerconsult.com]

    And for the official line:
    http://www.nyc.gov/html/media/totweb/taxioftomorrow_history_regulationandprosperity.html [nyc.gov]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Arik on Sunday November 30 2014, @04:08PM

    by Arik (4543) on Sunday November 30 2014, @04:08PM (#121287) Journal
    "http://www.nyc.gov/html/media/totweb/taxioftomorrow_history_regulationandprosperity.html"

    You don't even really have to read between the lines to get the point here, they say it fairly clearly and early on:

    "The Act's provisions included a limitation on the number of "medallion" licenses (and therefore, taxicabs) to the number that existed at the time. This number would be further reduced through attrition. As anticipated, this brought the supply of taxicabs closer to the level of service the public demanded, thus calming the fierce competition for customers. "

    That's what it was about - reducing competition.

    Uber is killing that and that's not a bad thing though obviously there is the danger of Uber gaining a position to reduce competition nation-wide instead of just in one small market - something to watch as time goes on.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?