SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The price of oil is now under $70 a barrel after OPEC decided it would not cut back production significantly in the months ahead and the latest OPEC move suggests that it isn’t going to reverse course anytime soon.. Now Neil Irwin reports in the NYT that the falling price of oil looks likely to be one of the dominant forces shaping the global economy in 2015. So who wins and who loses? Winner: Global consumers as anybody who drives a car or flies on airplanes gets lower prices for gasoline and jet fuel. Loser: American oil producers - One of the big open questions is just how many of the small, independent producers in the American heartland will still be viable with oil prices in the $60s rather than the $100s. Many have relied on borrowed money, and bankruptcies are possible. Loser: Vladimir Putin - Russia’s economy is already facing its sharpest challenges in years, as Western sanctions imposed after Russian aggression toward Ukraine crimp the nation’s ability to be integrated in the global economy. Russia is a major energy producer, and the falling price of oil compounds the challenge facing its president, Vladimir Putin.
Potential Loser: The environment. As a general rule, the cheaper fossil fuels become, the more challenging it will be for cleaner forms of energy like solar and wind power to be competitive on price. But solar and wind power are sources for electricity, whereas fluctuations in oil prices most directly affect the price of transportation fuels like gasoline and jet fuel. Unless or until more Americans use electric cars, they are largely separate markets, so there’s no reason that cheaper oil should cause a major reduction in investment in renewables. The average pump price of a gallon of regular gasoline in the United States was $3.12 this week, down from $3.80 in October 2012 and down from $3.70 just four months ago. In the past, cheaper gasoline has two environmentally problematic effects: It leads people to drive thirstier cars and trucks and to drive them more miles. This time may be different. The number of miles Americans drive per capita has declined for nine straight years dropping from roughly 10,100 miles in 2004 to about 9,400 miles in 2013. A change that significant suggests a change in lifestyle—one that would be hard to upend. In addition, the average fuel economy of new cars and trucks sold in the United States has increased markedly over the past decade—in contrast to the 1990s, when new-vehicle fuel economy essentially flat-lined. Today, the average new car sold in this country goes 36 miles on a gallon of gasoline, up from 29.5 mpg in 2004. "Times have changed since the dawn of the last era of cheap oil," says Jeffrey Ball. "Even assuming low oil prices are the new normal, a cleaner energy system probably is too."
(Score: 4, Interesting) by zocalo on Monday December 01 2014, @09:36AM
UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Kromagv0 on Monday December 01 2014, @01:26PM
I heard a similar analysis from the BBC over the weekend. They had mentioned that Saudi Arabia and Kuwait could ride out the low oil prices for a year or two without any real problems other than not growing their cash reserves. At the same time there are a lot of countries that are so dependent on oil, even in the region, that it could be a major disruptive force since their national budgets are dependent on oil revenue. Some of the countries that were listed as possibly facing problems were Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and Nigeria. The other thing mentioned was that the oil boom in the Bakken Range [wikipedia.org] and Alberta tar sands [wikipedia.org] might not be profitable thus allowing Saudi and Kuwaiti to expand in the long run. Finally it sounds like the Saudis didn't want to be the only ones to cut production and instead wanted others to share in the pain. All in all I would expect some more unrest in affected areas and the Saudis are playing a long game.
T-Shirts and bumper stickers [zazzle.com] to offend someone