Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday December 04 2014, @07:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the its-who-you-know-and-what-you-know dept.

The NYT reports that NY County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s most significant initiative has been to transform, through the use of data, the way district attorneys fight crime. “The question I had when I came in was, Do we sit on our hands waiting for crime to tick up, or can we do something to drive crime lower?” says Vance. “I wanted to develop what I call intelligence-driven prosecution.” When Vance became DA in 2009, it was glaringly evident that assistant D.A.s fielding the 105,000-plus cases a year in Manhattan seldom had enough information to make nuanced decisions about bail, charges, pleas or sentences. They were narrowly focused on the facts of cases in front of them, not on the people committing the crimes. They couldn’t quickly sort minor delinquents from irredeemably bad apples. They didn’t know what havoc defendants might be wreaking in other boroughs.

Vance divided Manhattan’s 22 police precincts into five areas and assigned a senior assistant D.A. and an analyst to map the crime in each area. CSU staff members met with patrol officers, detectives and Police Department field intelligence officers and asked police commanders to submit a list of each precinct’s 25 worst offenders — so-called crime drivers, whose “incapacitation by the criminal-justice system would have a positive impact on the community’s safety.” Seeded with these initial cases, the CSU built a searchable database that now includes more than 9,000 chronic offenders (PDF), virtually all of whom have criminal records. A large percentage are recidivists who have been repeatedly convicted of grand larceny, one of the top index crimes in Manhattan, but the list also includes active gang members, people whom the D.A. considers “uncooperative witnesses,” and a fluctuating number of violent “priority targets,” which currently stands at 81. “These are people we want to know about if they are arrested,” says Kerry Chicon. “We are constantly adding, deleting, editing and updating the intelligence in the Arrest Alert System. If someone gets out of a gang, or goes to prison for a long time, or moves out of the city or the state, or ages out of being a focus for us, or dies, we edit the system accordingly — we do that all the time.”

“It’s the ‘Moneyball’ approach to crime,” says Chauncey Parker. “The tool is data; the benefit, public safety and justice — whom are we going to put in jail? If you have 10 guys dealing drugs, which one do you focus on? The assistant district attorneys know the rap sheets, they have the police statements like before, but now they know if you lift the left sleeve you’ll find a gang tattoo and if you look you’ll see a scar where the defendant was once shot in the ankle. Some of the defendants are often surprised we know so much about them.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 04 2014, @08:34PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 04 2014, @08:34PM (#122693)

    1) End the Failed War on Drugs.
    Make drugs legal.
    Sell them the way alcohol and tobacco are sold.
    Tax them so that instead of being a money sink they are a revenue source.
    Public intoxication and driving under the influence are already crimes.
    Prohibition wasn't a success the first time it was tried ether.

    2) Reduce the number of cops.
    The rate of violent crimes has been dropping for decades, yet the number of cops continues to increase.
    Where there are huge number of crimes being committed, it's the cops that are committing them (violating the Constitution constantly).

    -- gewg_

  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Thursday December 04 2014, @09:19PM

    by ikanreed (3164) on Thursday December 04 2014, @09:19PM (#122703) Journal

    The rate of violent crimes has been dropping for decades, yet the number of cops continues to increase.

    eh..... not really [chicagojustice.org]

    Here's a more academic breakdown of police per capita and related factors [berkeley.edu]

    There's a lot in here about money, and how to get the idea protection per $, which you might find both helpful and hurtful to your cause, because it's complicated.
    In the graphs at the end, you can see that there's a strong predictor for rate of change in police officers per capita based on the total number of calls to police during the previous year.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Blackmoore on Thursday December 04 2014, @10:20PM

    by Blackmoore (57) on Thursday December 04 2014, @10:20PM (#122739) Journal

    http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/videos/ex-cop-declares-police-are-controlled-by-the-one-percent-video/ [ifyouonlynews.com]

    “It’s an oppressive organization now controlled by the one percent of corporate America. Corporate America is using police forces as their mercenaries.” (FreeThoughtProject)

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday December 04 2014, @10:22PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 04 2014, @10:22PM (#122741) Journal

    Public intoxication and driving under the influence are already crimes.

    Good God! You get a criminal record for being drunk in public?
    (turn out that, with small exceptions, this is the case [wikipedia.org]).

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
    • (Score: 1) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 04 2014, @10:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 04 2014, @10:46PM (#122750)

      A major social norm in the USA involves driving to a place where the main activity is consuming alcohol.
      It's a twisted society.

      -- gewg_

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 05 2014, @06:48AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 05 2014, @06:48AM (#122856)

        driving to a place where the main activity is consuming alcohol

        Driving who? I mean, why would one need be driven to a bar?
        I feel the natural behaviour of any sane person is to have an inbreed (or is it inebriated?) instinct to head towards a bar and have a pint.
        (grin)

        • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Friday December 05 2014, @10:05AM

          by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Friday December 05 2014, @10:05AM (#122878) Journal

          "A woman drove me to drink and I never had the decency to thank her"

          - 2Pac.

        • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday December 05 2014, @04:23PM

          by tangomargarine (667) on Friday December 05 2014, @04:23PM (#122952)

          There's a big difference between "in-bred instincts" and the act of inbreeding.

          --
          "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"