SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Journal by khallow
Given how often libertarians are mentioned here, I thought this would be interesting. And maybe there's some people with a lot more insight into what's going on.
A few months back (May 29), the national leadership of the Libertarian Party (the "Big L" political party, not the "small l" belief system) was taken over by a group called the "Mises Caucus". While their platform seems to be a mundane version of a normal platform.
In recent days, there's several state level "rebellions" which seems to indicate that the schism between the old guard and them isn't going away any time soon.
For me, they do seem to tilt at absolutist windmills rather than do stuff they want done - which is a common libertarian flaw. And the implicit emphasis on Mises economics is a huge problem for me. Their stance against vaccination and supporting Trump's allegations of election fraud seem pretty shifty.
OTOH, the previous leadership didn't seem all that interested in libertarianism. Maybe this will shake things up in a useful way?
So what are peoples' takes on this?
A few months back (May 29), the national leadership of the Libertarian Party (the "Big L" political party, not the "small l" belief system) was taken over by a group called the "Mises Caucus". While their platform seems to be a mundane version of a normal platform.
In recent days, there's several state level "rebellions" which seems to indicate that the schism between the old guard and them isn't going away any time soon.
For me, they do seem to tilt at absolutist windmills rather than do stuff they want done - which is a common libertarian flaw. And the implicit emphasis on Mises economics is a huge problem for me. Their stance against vaccination and supporting Trump's allegations of election fraud seem pretty shifty.
OTOH, the previous leadership didn't seem all that interested in libertarianism. Maybe this will shake things up in a useful way?
So what are peoples' takes on this?
Reply to: Re:It's Important to Remember...
Post Comment
Do not use if foil seal is broken.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 20 2022, @03:40AM
Fair enough. Money has far too much influence on our politics (and hence, our governance), which isn't new and is definitely a big problem.
But how would that change if we were to go the big 'L' Libertarian Party way? Those with the most resources would dominate there, too.
The difference is that as far as the government is concerned, there's an opportunity to change that. That wouldn't be easy, since our institutions have been moving to encourage that river of filthy lucre rather than discourage it.
In the big 'L' scenario, there would be no opportunity for change, except the "free market" which will, of course, be dominated by those with the most resources.
I'd rather have an opportunity (even a small one) over none at all.