Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by quietus

It's not a war, but a Special Military Operation. And that operation goes so well, it is now time not to call a general mobilisation, but only a partial mobilisation.

On Wednesday September 21, at 09:15h, Russian President Vladimir Putin made the announcement that was rumored since days: all members of the Russian Army's reserve, as well as anybody who has ever served in the Russian military, are called upon to do their duty in the Special Military Operation, fighting the Nazi-Ukrainian forces.

Refusing to report will result in 15 years prison. Skipping out during service will result in 15 years prison. And surrendering to the enemy without being incapacitated will result in 15 years prison, as will not trying to flee from a POW camp.

The move is not unexpected. The Ukrainian counter-offensive triggered the first comments on Russian television about the need for mobilisation, and it was just waiting until Russian regional elections had passed, last week. On top of that, the recent meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation didn't go to plan, apparently.

First there was India's Modi publicly stating that this ain't a time for war, and that he had repeatedly asked to stop the whole thing. Then there was a falling out over the same subject with both Turkey and Kazakhstan, to which Putin apparently reacted very agressively. All combined might perhaps explain the rather confused press conference afterwards.

Immediately after the end of the SCO Summit, one Nikolai Patrushev stepped on a plane to meet with Chinese colleagues to discuss strategic stability and public security and law and order. He returned after 2 days, on the 19th. On the 20th, a statement by Putin was announced for the evening, but that was postponed for reasons unknown.

In a first phase, 300,000 reservists are being called up but, as Russia's Kommersant business newspaper noted, the total number of people who will be called up is secret, hence open to modification.

Do I need to add that it all ended with the threat to use nuclear weapons?

Official announcement here.

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 22 2022, @03:24AM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 22 2022, @03:24AM (#1272938) Journal
    My take is that the same argument that worked six months ago works now. Not much point to complaining how boring it is.
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Thursday September 22 2022, @04:44AM (2 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 22 2022, @04:44AM (#1272943) Homepage Journal

    Translation: You've long ago made your mind up, and are unwilling to look at other perspectives or evidence.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 22 2022, @07:26AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 22 2022, @07:26AM (#1272948)

      One of the pretexts of MAGA seems to be that for America to return to its gold era of the 1950s-70s, Cold War 2.0 needs a strong villain.

      What a pity Ukrainians are then merely collateral damage in your far right fantasy.

      Why do you keep supporting a genocidal cunt like Putin?

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Thursday September 22 2022, @12:01PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 22 2022, @12:01PM (#1272968) Journal
      Where's that evidence?

      I'll note, for example, that you've never provided evidence for significant Koch brothers or Soros involvement in the 2014 Euromaidan revolution. I gather there's some crude statements by US officials that implies material US support, perhaps even that CIA support that is alleged. Meanwhile, when you look at the timeline [wikipedia.org], there's plenty of large protests throughout the saga. Then and now, there's a lot of effort by the locals that's being completely dismissed because foreign involvement is exaggerated.

      My guess is that this is merely a bit of propaganda to invalidate Euromaidan and of course, blame the Great Satan. If it's just CIA/Soros/Koch brothers, then the revolution doesn't count and the US started it all. That's been your line too, right?

      All I can say, is that the Ukrainians are pretty eager for a foreign-led coup. I think it's worth comparing this to a genuine CIA-led coup, that of Afghanistan. As long as there were US military providing firepower on the ground, Afghanistan was stable. The moment the US left, the Taliban took over. There wasn't even a slight effort at preserving the government.

      While it is obvious that Ukraine would have done far worse without the massive supply of foreign weapons, they've fought this war themselves - not US forces with the locals watching on. They defeated that decapitation strike and have repeatedly shown strong initiative, such as repeatedly taking advantage of Russian mistakes and weaknesses.

      As to perspectives, flat Earth is also a perspective. Evidence is what makes the perspective worth considering. There's an AC muttering about "unfounded war mongering propaganda", but they won't provide even the slightest support for the allegation.

      Last time you provided a serious perspective to your argument in a journal, we had the typical one-sided arguments [soylentnews.org].

      Notice that Mearsheimer doesn't refute anything he downplays. Russia was indeed aggressive. We still have to worry about a greater Russian empire. We still have that sordid history of failure of appeasement even if he terms responses to resist Russian aggression as "doubling down". We still have that the present day Ukraine prefers their sequence of non-Russian backed government to the former Russian one. Or that Ukraine matters to other parties than the Russians.

      The problem here is that no matter how much the Ukraine matters to Russia, they've been a very bad neighbor, manipulating governments, invading Ukraine territory, various forms of harassment acknowledged by Mearsheimer, and stoking civil war for the past seven years. Sometimes you just don't get what you want.