Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Thursday September 29 2022, @01:27AM   Printer-friendly

Mozilla reaffirms that Firefox will continue to support current content blockers - gHacks Tech News:

From next year onward, extensions for Google Chrome and most other Chromium-based browsers, will have to rely on a new extension manifest. Manifest V3 defines the boundaries in which extensions may operate.

Current Chromium extensions use Manifest V2 for the most part, even though the January 2023 deadline is looming over the heads of every extension developer.

[...] By June 2023, Chrome and most Chromium-based browsers won't support Manifest v2 extensions anymore. Those installed will be disabled automatically, because they are no longer compatible. Those offered on the Chrome Web Store will vanish, unless their developers published an update to make them compatible with the new Manifest v3.

[...] While Manifest v3 does not mean the end for content blocking on Chrome, Edge and other Chromium-based browsers, it may limit abilities under certain circumstances. Users who install a single content blocker and no other extension that relies on the same relevant API may not notice much of a change, but those who like to add custom filter lists or use multiple extensions that rely on the API, may run into artificial limits set by Google.

[...] Mozilla reaffirmed this week that its plan has not changed. In "These weeks in Firefox: issue 124", the organization confirms that it will support the WebRequst API of Manifest v2 alongside Manifest v3.

[...] That is good news for users of the web browser who use content blockers such as uBlock Origin. The extension, which its developer claims operates best under Firefox, is the most popular extension for Firefox based on the number of installations and ratings.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by maxwell demon on Thursday September 29 2022, @05:13AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 29 2022, @05:13AM (#1274153) Journal

    Chrome being run by an advertising company was always a conflict of interest. I'm surprised it took them this long to clamp down on adblocking.

    They certainly had to wait until people were sufficiently dependent. This meant in particular:

    • Getting sufficient market share so that most people will stay anyway.
    • Getting sufficient market share for sufficiently long that web site developers start checking only on Chrome

    In short, they had first to become the new IE (and in a sense they literally did, now that Microsoft's browser also uses their engine).

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5