On 30 August 2012, Hollywood star Clint Eastwood took the stage to lambast President Obama. What ensued was an odd, 11-minute monologue where Eastwood conversed with an empty chair upon which an imaginary Barack Obama sat. The evening of Eastwood’s speech the official campaign Twitter account @MittRomney did not mention the actor, while the Obama campaign deftly tweeted out from @BarackObama a picture of the president sitting in his chair with the words “This Seat’s Taken”. The picture was retweeted 59,663 times, favorited 23,887 times, and, as importantly, was featured in news articles across the country. According to Daniel Kress both campaigns sought to influence journalists in direct and indirect ways, and planned their strategic communication efforts around political events such as debates well in advance. Despite these similarities, staffers say that Obama’s campaign had much greater ability to respond in real time to unfolding commentary around political events (PDF) given an organizational structure that provided digital staffers with a high degree of autonomy.
Romney's social media team did well when it practiced its strategy carefully before big events like the debates. But Obama's social media team was often quicker to respond to things and more creative. According to Kress, at extraordinary moments campaigns can exercise what Isaac Reed calls “performative power,” influence over other actors’ definitions of the situation and their consequent actions through well-timed, resonant, and rhetorically effective communicative action and interaction. During the Romney campaign as many as 22 staffers screened posts for Romeny's social media accounts before they could go out. As Romney’s digital director Zac Moffatt told Kreiss, the campaign had “the best tweets ever written by 17 people. ... It was the best they all could agree on every single time.”
(Score: 1) by quixote on Sunday December 07 2014, @04:12PM
Obama had cared as much about governing as campaigning. The administration could have reacted to Syria before it was a disaster. The Obamacare website and backend might have worked. Maybe they could have even passed a jobs bill and done something to help people with fraudulent banks holding their mortgages. You know, in the first two years, when the Democrats controlled both Houses of Congress.
(Score: 2) by cmn32480 on Sunday December 07 2014, @05:20PM
You mean that if he cared about governing, I would have some hope to have more than the change in my pocket when he leaves office?
Somehow I doubt it will happen, and I am not so certain the Republicans will be much better.
"It's a dog eat dog world, and I'm wearing Milkbone underwear" - Norm Peterson
(Score: 1) by PartTimeZombie on Monday December 08 2014, @12:37AM
Of course the Republicans will not be any better, they're just the other side of the same coin.