New Theory Concludes That the Origin of Life on Earth-Like Planets Is Likely:
Does the existence of life on Earth tell us anything about the probability of abiogenesis — the origin of life from inorganic substances — arising elsewhere? That's a question that has confounded scientists, and anyone else inclined to ponder it, for some time.
A widely accepted argument from Australian-born astrophysicist Brandon Carter argues that the selection effect of our own existence puts constraints on our observation. Since we had to find ourselves on a planet where abiogenesis occurred, then nothing can be inferred about the probability of life elsewhere based on this knowledge alone.
[...] However, a new paper by Daniel Whitmire, a retired astrophysicist who currently teaches mathematics at the U of A, is arguing that Carter used faulty logic. Though Carter's theory has become widely accepted, Whitmire argues that it suffers from what's known as "The Old Evidence Problem" in Bayesian Confirmation Theory, which is used to update a theory or hypothesis in light of new evidence.
[...] As he explains, "One could argue, like Carter, that I exist regardless of whether my conception was hard or easy, and so nothing can be inferred about whether my conception was hard or easy from my existence alone."
In this analogy, "hard" means contraception was used. "Easy" means no contraception was used. In each case, Whitmire assigns values to these propositions.
Whitmire continues, "However, my existence is old evidence and must be treated as such. When this is done the conclusion is that it is much more probable that my conception was easy. In the abiogenesis case of interest, it's the same thing. The existence of life on Earth is old evidence and just like in the conception analogy the probability that abiogenesis is easy is much more probable."
Journal Reference:
Daniel P. Whitmire. Abiogenesis: the Carter argument reconsidered [open], Int J Astrobio, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/S1473550422000350
(Score: 2) by inertnet on Wednesday October 05 2022, @08:31PM (3 children)
He usually explains his own or other people's scientific work on astrology, exoplanets and such. Not just a talking head, he visualizes the things he's explaining.
(Score: 3, Touché) by DannyB on Wednesday October 05 2022, @08:56PM (2 children)
What if I find astrology unconvincing?
To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
(Score: 2) by inertnet on Wednesday October 05 2022, @10:07PM (1 child)
Sorry, astronomy. Astrology has nothing to do with science, but I tend to mix up those words.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday October 06 2022, @07:19PM
Mixing them up makes sense because of the "logy" suffix witch means "science of" or "study of".
Anthropology
Biology
Epidemiology
Epistemology
Geology
Meteorology
Microbiology
Pharmacology
Proctology
It is unfortunate that the term Astrology became attached to something so bogus as the planets affecting our lives. (unless they are on a collision course with the Earth.)
To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.