"In this large, observational study, ground, instant and decaffeinated coffee were associated with equivalent reductions in the incidence of cardiovascular disease and death from cardiovascular disease or any cause," said study author Professor Peter Kistler of the Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. "The results suggest that mild to moderate intake of ground, instant and decaffeinated coffee should be considered part of a healthy lifestyle."
There is little information on the impact of different coffee preparations on heart health and survival. This study examined the associations between types of coffee and incident arrhythmias, cardiovascular disease and death using data from the UK Biobank, which recruited adults between 40 and 69 years of age. Cardiovascular disease was comprised of coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure and ischaemic stroke.
[...] A total of 27,809 (6.2%) participants died during follow up. All types of coffee were linked with a reduction in death from any cause. The greatest risk reduction seen with two to three cups per day, which compared to no coffee drinking was associated with a 14%, 27% and 11% lower likelihood of death for decaffeinated, ground, and instant preparations, respectively.
Cardiovascular disease was diagnosed in 43,173 (9.6%) participants during follow up. All coffee subtypes were associated with a reduction in incident cardiovascular disease. [...]
An arrhythmia was diagnosed in 30,100 (6.7%) participants during follow up. Ground and instant coffee, but not decaffeinated, was associated with a reduction in arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. [...]
Professor Kistler said: "Caffeine is the most well-known constituent in coffee, but the beverage contains more than 100 biologically active components. It is likely that the non-caffeinated compounds were responsible for the positive relationships observed between coffee drinking, cardiovascular disease and survival. Our findings indicate that drinking modest amounts of coffee of all types should not be discouraged but can be enjoyed as a heart healthy behaviour."
Journal Reference:
David Chieng, Rodrigo Canovas, Louise Segan, et al. The impact of coffee subtypes on incident cardiovascular disease, arrhythmias, and mortality: long-term outcomes from the UK Biobank [open]. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac189
Some previous stories:
New Research Finally Proves That Coffee is Safe During Pregnancy
Scientists Identify How Caffeine Reduces Bad Cholesterol
Coffee's Health Benefits Aren't as Straightforward as They Seem
Coffee May Reduce Risk of Death From Stroke and Heart Disease
(Score: 2, Flamebait) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Saturday October 08 2022, @09:52AM (6 children)
I've read hundreds of studies on the effects of anything from coffee to tea, wine, roughage, seafood, fruit, tobacco, physical exercize or masturbation, and the conclusion is ALWAYS, WITHOUT FAIL that it's good for you if you do it with moderation.
So, like, yeah... *yawn*
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday October 08 2022, @11:53AM (2 children)
Always? Cyanide is good for you as long as you do it in moderation?
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Saturday October 08 2022, @01:19PM (1 child)
Well, yesss, it's just that in the case of cyanide "moderate" is an *extremely* small amount.
I think the trick is in the definition of "moderate". A moderate amount of breathing is good for you. So is a moderate amount of sugar. The doses are a lot different, though. The amount of Selenium that is moderate isn't the same as the amount of iron, but you need the right amount of both. (And it wouldn't surprise me if you need *SOME* cyanide. Just not very much.)
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 3, Funny) by EEMac on Sunday October 09 2022, @02:57AM
> it wouldn't surprise me if you need *SOME* cyanide.
I can think of a few people who definitely need some cyanide.
(Score: 3, Funny) by driverless on Saturday October 08 2022, @12:41PM
A friend and I are in the planning stages of a study to determine whether watching old reruns of Top Gear while pantsdrunk is good for you. Preliminary analysis indicates that it probably is, but quite a bit of further experimentation will be required. The control group will be run with salmiakki, but so far we haven't found any volunteers for it.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by wisnoskij on Saturday October 08 2022, @12:52PM (1 child)
Most likely it is linked to the participants affluence. If you did a tobacco study in a really really poor country, you would probably find that smoking moderately is correlated with longer lives.
Drinking a brand of $200 whisky instead of a $5 bottle weekly does not actually extend your life, but it implies they make good life choices.
(Score: 2) by stretch611 on Sunday October 09 2022, @01:49AM
Good Life choices?!? hardly.
Being able to afford the expensive stuff just means that they have money... while it is possible that they made smart choices and succeeded in life in modern times it is much more likely to mean that they grew up with wealthy parents more than anything else; and they could be just a dumb joe schmoe who squanders inherited wealth.
But money does mean that you are more likely to afford regular doctor visits and more likely to afford to pay for your needed prescriptions. Those two things above all else mean a lot for someone's health.
Now with 5 covid vaccine shots/boosters altering my DNA :P