Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Monday December 08 2014, @09:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the pay-no-attention-to-the-man-behind-the-curtain dept.

I've been hinting around about this for a week or two, so here it is. I circulated this proposal around the staff mailing list before Thanksgiving and got nobody telling me it sucks and to die in a fire, so it falls to you lot to do it if necessary. Let's be clear beforehand though. This is not a complete solution; no meta-mod consideration included for instance. Nor is it a permanent change. What it is is an experiment. Unless you lot are overwhelmingly opposed, we'll run it for a month or two and either keep it, keep parts of it, or trash it entirely based on staff and community feedback. We're not the other site and this isn't Beta; what we as a community want is what's going to happen.

So, here's the deal with the bit that's likely to be most controversial right out front. Bad downmods and mod-bombing both suck hardcore but you can't really get rid of them and still have downmods even with meta-moderation because you still have the same ideologically driven few who think Troll/Flamebait/Overrated means Disagree. To that end, I converted all the downmods to +0 mods and added a proper Disagree +0 mod. They affect neither score of the comment nor karma of the commenter but will show up beside the comment score (and be subject to user adjustment from their comments preferences page) if they hold a majority vote. It'll be entirely possible, for instance, to have a +5 Troll comment and equally possible that the same comment will show as -1 Troll to someone who has Troll set to -6 in their preferences.

Underrated and Overrated are also out. For Underrated, I for one would really like to know why you think it's underrated. For Overrated, it was almost exclusively used as Disagree, which we now have.

Second, everyone who's been registered for a month or more gets five mod points a day. We're not getting enough mods on comments to suit the number of comments; this should have been tweaked a while back but we quite frankly just let it slip through the cracks. Also, the zero-mod system will need the extra points to reliably push comments from +5 insightful to +5 Flamebait if they warrant it. We may end up tweaking this number as necessary to find the right balance during The Experiment.

Third, we're introducing a new Spam mod. As of this writing it's a -1 to comment score and a -10 to the commenter's karma; this may very well change. Sounds easily abused, yeah? Not so much. Every comment with this mod applied to it will have a link out beside the score that any staff with editor or above clearance on the main site (this excludes me by the way) can simply click to undo every aspect of the spam moderation and ban the moderator(s) who said it was from moderating. First time for a month, second time for six months; these also are arbitrary numbers that could easily change. So, what qualifies as spam so you don't inadvertently get mod-banned?

  • Proper spam. Anything whose primary purpose is advertisement.
  • HOSTS/GNAA/etc... type posts. Recurring, useless annoyances we're all familiar with.
  • Posts so offtopic and lacking value to even be a troll that they can't be called anything else. See here for an example.

Caveats about banning aside, if something is really spam, please use the mod. It will make it much, much easier for us to find spam posts and attempt to block the spammers. One SELECT statement period vs one per post level of easier.

Lastly, if I can find it and change it in time for thorough testing on dev, we'll be doing away with mod-then-post in favor of mod-and-post. Without proper downmods, there's really just no point in limiting you on when you can moderate a comment.

Right, that's pretty much it. Flame or agree as the spirit moves you. Suggestions will all be read and considered but getting them debated, coded, and tested before the January release will be a bit tricky for all but the exceedingly simple ones.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Zyx Abacab on Monday December 08 2014, @09:13PM

    by Zyx Abacab (3701) on Monday December 08 2014, @09:13PM (#123861)

    Not five minutes after I griped about moderation on this site, there's a sign of improvement! Way to go, SoylentNews!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by bob_super on Tuesday December 09 2014, @01:42AM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday December 09 2014, @01:42AM (#123993)

    It's the power of Open Source... and TMB will need a new keyboard.

    Meanwhile, in closed-source land, Microsoft Outlook still won't let me Mod my boss's emails Overrated or Flamebait...

  • (Score: 2) by jackb_guppy on Tuesday December 09 2014, @11:09PM

    by jackb_guppy (3560) on Tuesday December 09 2014, @11:09PM (#124418)

    I like under and overrated. The issues I have is 5+- is not enough, Capping KARMA at 50 is stupid. Do not toss out the baby with the bathwater. But this to poll vs comments in article!

    IF you must change:
    Give BOTH points to raise and lower score AND classifications. Give every one 5 points to use every day, period, in ANY quanity I want to give from all 5+- to 1+-. Every one also can classify a comment (good/bad/funny/sad/horseshit/whatever. The two things are not one system nor do they have relationship to one another UNLESS you add a general channel class.

    Channel class takes us farther down this rabbit hole, making general viewing class, so if I want to follow to the TROLL's view of the information I can choose that.

    In the a system like the V-chip, it is limited one view point, very limited. Current mod system is that too. If the V-chip had say 100 channels, with Baptists getting to score one, Nudist another, Police Federation a third... I could pick the groups that I like to follow and score level I want to limit by. Then only the options that match both (or average of many) would be what I want to see. If I score an item then all the views that I am associated would get a equal ticks up or down.