Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Tuesday December 09 2014, @11:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the painful-truths dept.

The NYT reports that with the release of the long-awaited Senate report on the use of torture by the United States government — a detailed account that will shed an unsparing light on the Central Intelligence Agency’s darkest practices after the September 2001 terrorist attacks, the US is bracing itself for the risk that it will set off a backlash overseas. Some leading Republican lawmakers have warned against releasing the report, saying that domestic and foreign intelligence reports indicate that a detailed account of the brutal interrogation methods used by the CIA during the George W. Bush administration could incite unrest and violence, even resulting in the deaths of Americans. The White House acknowledged that the report could pose a “greater risk” to American installations and personnel in countries like Pakistan, Yemen, Egypt, Libya and Iraq. But it said that the government had months to plan for the reverberations from its report — indeed, years — and that those risks should not delay the release of the report by the Senate Intelligence Committee. “When would be a good time to release this report?” the White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, asked. “It’s difficult to imagine one, particularly given the painful details that will be included.”

Among the administration’s concerns is that terrorist groups will exploit the disclosures in the report for propaganda value. The Islamic State already clads its American hostages in orange jumpsuits, like those worn by prisoners in CIA interrogations. Hostages held by the Islamic State in Syria were subjected to waterboarding, one of the practices used by the CIA to extract information from suspected terrorists. The 480-page document reveals the results of Senate investigation into the CIA's use of torture and other techniques that violate international law against prisoners held on terrorism-related charges. Though many details of the Senate's findings will remain classified – the document is a summary of a 6,000-page report that is not being released – the report is expected to conclude that the methods used by the CIA to interrogate prisoners during the post-9/11 years were more extreme than previously admitted and produced no intelligence that could not have been acquired through legal means.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by pnkwarhall on Wednesday December 10 2014, @01:23AM

    by pnkwarhall (4558) on Wednesday December 10 2014, @01:23AM (#124450)

    The argument against releasing the report, according to "leading Republican lawmakers", is that making the contents known could incite violence against Americans -- not just cast the country in a bad light. The response from administration officials is that (FTFA) "they do not expect the report [...] to ignite [...] violence."

    This is the sentiment I have a problem with. The response from the administration isn't that the report should be released because "it's the right thing to do" or because they support transparency in government. Instead, the response seems to be that it's "OK" to release because it won't result in any kind of real consequences for the US. This is the kind of thinking I expect from my children -- if I tell Dad the truth, I'll be punished so I should just continue with the lie.

    I expect^H^H^H^H^H desire mature, and more importantly, **moral** thinking from the people chosen to lead and represent me. This is neither. **Consequences are how we learn.**

    --
    Lift Yr Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday December 10 2014, @12:56PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 10 2014, @12:56PM (#124624) Journal

    I expect^H^H^H^H^H desire mature, and more importantly, **moral** thinking from the people chosen to lead and represent me. This is neither. **Consequences are how we learn.**

    Unfortunately, in this case, it's them who should learn; will they ever?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by pnkwarhall on Wednesday December 10 2014, @05:21PM

      by pnkwarhall (4558) on Wednesday December 10 2014, @05:21PM (#124777)

      I don't think we can fully lay the blame on the politicians. We've got protesters in the streets right now about police brutality and lack of consequences -- I don't remember the same reaction when the torture methods first came to light. As horrible as it sounds, "we the people" ARE responsible for the actions and attitudes of our representatives/leaders.

      I like to bitch (on this site and elsewhere) about the negative influence that corporations have on our society. But it's our society that built and supports the corporate status quo.

      People built the system, and only people can replace it.

      --
      Lift Yr Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven