Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Tuesday December 09 2014, @11:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the painful-truths dept.

The NYT reports that with the release of the long-awaited Senate report on the use of torture by the United States government — a detailed account that will shed an unsparing light on the Central Intelligence Agency’s darkest practices after the September 2001 terrorist attacks, the US is bracing itself for the risk that it will set off a backlash overseas. Some leading Republican lawmakers have warned against releasing the report, saying that domestic and foreign intelligence reports indicate that a detailed account of the brutal interrogation methods used by the CIA during the George W. Bush administration could incite unrest and violence, even resulting in the deaths of Americans. The White House acknowledged that the report could pose a “greater risk” to American installations and personnel in countries like Pakistan, Yemen, Egypt, Libya and Iraq. But it said that the government had months to plan for the reverberations from its report — indeed, years — and that those risks should not delay the release of the report by the Senate Intelligence Committee. “When would be a good time to release this report?” the White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, asked. “It’s difficult to imagine one, particularly given the painful details that will be included.”

Among the administration’s concerns is that terrorist groups will exploit the disclosures in the report for propaganda value. The Islamic State already clads its American hostages in orange jumpsuits, like those worn by prisoners in CIA interrogations. Hostages held by the Islamic State in Syria were subjected to waterboarding, one of the practices used by the CIA to extract information from suspected terrorists. The 480-page document reveals the results of Senate investigation into the CIA's use of torture and other techniques that violate international law against prisoners held on terrorism-related charges. Though many details of the Senate's findings will remain classified – the document is a summary of a 6,000-page report that is not being released – the report is expected to conclude that the methods used by the CIA to interrogate prisoners during the post-9/11 years were more extreme than previously admitted and produced no intelligence that could not have been acquired through legal means.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Wednesday December 10 2014, @08:45PM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 10 2014, @08:45PM (#124857)
    Okay. So what if the opponent maintains a superior position because they have no morals? Hmm I'll phrase it a different way: I don't own a gun. I don't want to own a gun. I don't want to shoot anybody. But if an armed intruder ended up in my house and I managed to get his gun, I cannot say with honesty that I wouldn't at least put some serious consideration into ending that situation once and for all. There's a very good chance I'd fire. Is that an appropriate time to compromise my morals, or is there a point where my own existence is more important? If so, what's the objective way to measure that?
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday December 11 2014, @04:16AM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Thursday December 11 2014, @04:16AM (#124958)

    In such a situation, you did not compromise your morals. You didn't own a gun and didn't want to. You still don't own a gun (it isn't yours), even if you took one from an attacker and used it against them. It's also a simple case of self-defense. Absolutely no morals were compromised.

    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday December 11 2014, @09:14PM

      by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 11 2014, @09:14PM (#125256)
      That is a good point, thank you.
      --
      🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈