Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday October 24 2022, @07:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-enough-for-me dept.

Coming soon to a job near you: Knowing what it pays:

You wouldn't rent an apartment or even buy a pair of jeans online without knowing the price. Soon, many Americans won't search for a job without knowing what it pays, either.

A series of local and state laws, both newly adopted and soon to be in effect, will force companies to divulge what a job pays when posting an open position. Besides being common sense, the intent of these laws is to shrink the persistent wage gap that divides white men from women and people of color. Lowering the pay gap would be an important step forward for equality in the US, affecting everything from Americans' quality of life to how they see themselves. But while pay transparency is a much-needed improvement, a lot more is needed to truly create balance for all Americans.

In the US, women and people of color get paid less than white men, regardless of job or experience. Pay gaps often begin at the start of careers, then compound over a lifetime as women and people of color are less likely to get raises. A variety of other factors contribute to the gap as well, like the motherhood penalty, wherein women who take time off paid work to care for kids are paid nearly 40 percent less than those who don't. There's occupational segregation, in which jobs that are filled predominantly by women or people of color, like home health aides or food service workers, are paid less. (The pay and prestige of computer science, for example, rose only as more men entered the field.) Women and people of color are also seriously underrepresented in leadership positions, which are paid the most. In sum, that means the median hourly wage for women is 86 cents per hour for every dollar a man makes. Black women make 68 cents. There's been little progress on closing the pay gap in the last three decades.

[...] "Transparency is one of the leading tools we've identified for closing the wage gap," Andrea Johnson, director of state policy at the National Women's Law Center, told Recode. "It is absolutely crucial for both increasing worker power and employer accountability."


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by SomeGuy on Monday October 24 2022, @09:03PM (2 children)

    by SomeGuy (5632) on Monday October 24 2022, @09:03PM (#1278211)

    Great, they have to tell what it pays.

    Now can they start actually telling us what the job actually _IS_?!

    Yea, the job lists 100 responsibilities in things that no single person could ever do, certainly not even to the extent they make it sound like.

    Then the next one just goes on about how great some company is.

    Then the next one just has a bunch of bullshit that someone obviously just copied from 1000 others that sound exactly the same. Fine for an assembly line worker, but not so fine when you know damn well the job is a unique technical position.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Monday October 24 2022, @10:02PM

    by Rosco P. Coltrane (4757) on Monday October 24 2022, @10:02PM (#1278235)

    Now can they start actually telling us what the job actually _IS_?!

    They do say what it is, but you need the glossary. Here's an excerpt:

    - Maintenance worker: janitor
    - Delivery associate: Amazon driver
    - Administrative assistant: secretary
    - Sanitation engineer: trashman
    - Home executive: housewise
    - Guest services ambassador: greeter
    - Eviction specialist: bouncer

    and of course, everybody's favorite:

    - In-between jobs: unemployed

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2022, @12:09AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2022, @12:09AM (#1278251)

    Yea, the job lists 100 responsibilities in things that no single person could ever do, certainly not even to the extent they make it sound like.

    That's so first the first year (or as long as it takes for you to figure it out) they can be "disappointed" and "want to see more progress" while absolutely nobody else is doing anything remotely close to the absurd "expectations" (which are fake).