Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday December 10 2014, @11:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the he-earned-it,-he-can-keep-it dept.

Spotted over at The Scientist is the report that the winning bidder will return Watson's Nobel prize medal following the auction last week.

It turns out that James Watson’s Nobel Prize medal, which he won in 1962 for co-discovering the structure of DNA, will be staying with the biologist after all. The Russian entrepreneur Alisher Usmanov, who paid $4.1 million for the medal at an auction last week (December 4), will return the prize to its original owner, The New York Times reports.

The New York Times' report adds:

Mr. Usmanov said his father had died of cancer, so he valued Dr. Watson’s contributions to cancer research. “It is important for me that the money that I spent on this medal will go to supporting scientific research,” [Usmanov] said, “and the medal will stay with the person who deserved it.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 11 2014, @07:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 11 2014, @07:11PM (#125179)

    > In the real world, it is rare that one can fully optimize for two intertwined goals simultaneously.

    Hello, McFly? Don't you get it? You are making the assumption that they are entertwined in the first place. There is ZERO FUCKING evidence that intelligence is intertwined with any other "goal" unique to the african continent.

    > Why does racist behavior exist in the first place?

    Racism, and bigotry in general, is just tribalism taken to an extreme. Tribalism is what makes community building possible - social institutions, trust, etc all depend on tribalism. But tribalism is a mental short-cut, a heuristic and as such it gets misapplied by people who aren't willing to rise above simply using mental shortcuts and applying critical thought.

    > That would be another example of how traits can make you less intelligent, wouldn't you say?

    Nope. You've over--simplified to the point of eliminating context and meaning.

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday December 11 2014, @08:44PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 11 2014, @08:44PM (#125240) Journal

    Hello, McFly? Don't you get it? You are making the assumption that they are entertwined in the first place. There is ZERO FUCKING evidence that intelligence is intertwined with any other "goal" unique to the african continent.

    And if you had read the next sentence, you would have read why I thought that:

    One could argue that the interconnection between brain activity and body response to disease is completely different, but that ignores common metabolic systems and the interaction of genes and proteins.