Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SCOTUS Finds in Favor of Amazon, No Pay for Mandatory Security Screenings

posted by janrinok on Thursday December 11 2014, @02:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the my-time-is-my-own dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

The Supreme Court of the United States has issued a unanimous decision that security screenings after the work day, regardless of the amount of time they take to perform, do not qualify for remuneration. The decision focuses on the Portal-To-Portal Act of 1947 which defines a workday that specifically excludes those activities "incidental" to an employee's primary responsibilities.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
SCOTUS Finds in Favor of Amazon, No Pay for Mandatory Security Screenings | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 61 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 11 2014, @09:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 11 2014, @09:11PM (#125254)

    Well, until now I was thinking of buying a couple of things from Amazon but since I read that, they won't get another penny from me. I'll shop elsewhere.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 11 2014, @10:43PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 11 2014, @10:43PM (#125290)

    So then, WalMart.com?

    It's not easy to find companies that don't all read off the same page.

    For those trying to empower The Working Class, here's a list to get you started, courtesy of the National Center for Employee Ownership. [nceo.org]

    -- gewg_