Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Sunday November 20 2022, @12:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the gotta-wake-up-and-smell-the-collective-coffee dept.

Morning light helps keep our internal clocks on track. Daylight saving time throws that off:

Daylight saving time has ended, and most Americans have turned their clocks back an hour. My sixth-grader is in heaven.

At 6:50 a.m. these days, our once testy tween zombie is now ... moderately awake and relatively lucid.

Instead of rising to gauzy predawn light, she's got glowy morning sunshine beaming around her curtains. When she sets off for school, the sun has been up nearly a full hour. Just a 60-minute change has lightened both the morning and her mood. At breakfast today, I think I even spied a smile.

On November 6, every state in the United States except Hawaii and most of Arizona switched from daylight saving time, or DST, to standard time (those two states don't observe DST). That switch shifted an hour of light from the evening to the morning. In March, we'll move in the other direction when we "spring forward," trading morning light for brighter evenings.

The United States' biannual time change has been lighting up headlines since the U.S. Senate's unanimous vote in March to make daylight saving time permanent. The Sunshine Protection Act would forgo turning clocks to and fro, repeating an unpopular experiment Congress tried in the 1970s and prioritizing evening light throughout the year. But the health case for staying on daylight saving time is pretty dim. And what such a shift could mean for adolescents is especially gloomy.

Even the name "daylight saving time" isn't quite right, says Kenneth Wright, a sleep and circadian expert at the University of Colorado Boulder. There's no change in the amount of daylight, he says. "What we're doing is changing how we live relative to the sun." When we move our clocks forward an hour, noon no longer represents when the sun is near its highest point in the sky. Suddenly, people's schedules are solarly out of sync.

That's a big deal biologically, Wright says. Humans evolved with a daily cycle of light and dark. That sets the rhythms of our bodies, from when we sleep and wake to when hormones are released. Morning light, in particular, is a key wake-up signal. When we tinker with time, he says, "we're essentially making the choice: Do we want to go with what we've evolved with, or do we want to alter that?"

From a health perspective, if he had to rank permanent daylight saving time, permanent standard time or our current practice of biannual clock changing, Wright says, "I think the answer is incredibly clear." Permanent standard time is healthiest for humans, he says. In his view, permanent daylight saving time ranks last.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by istartedi on Friday December 02 2022, @06:18PM

    by istartedi (123) on Friday December 02 2022, @06:18PM (#1280952) Journal

    This is not a popular idea and I'm not necessarily sure I'd be for it, but consider that time zones are the real issue here. We only got time zones in the USA because 19th century railroads had a hard time making sane train schedules without them. Prior to that, the big clock in the town square wasn't just decoration. It actually mattered. It chimed, people set their watches by it, and it varied from town-to-town.

    It seems like the modern world might be able to handle a return to the status quo ante railroad with appropriate technology. One UTC that never changes, for all the machines and devices that need it, like trains, air navigation systems, computer networks, etc. Everybody else could use "town time" and our modern devices could even pick up a local signal and automatically compute the offset for us. Then the local school district, at the county level could decide when to send the kids to school, instead of people at the western or eastern edges of a vast "one time fits all" zone getting frustrated.

    Even the metric people don't use Kelvins for weather. They use Celcius because it's a better fit for people, so the notion of one simple number for science/machines and a number tailored for humans is already baked in to a lot of systems.

    Like I said though, it's not a popular idea so I know I'm just fantasizing here.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2