Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday December 03, @07:52PM   Printer-friendly

Elon Musk and Neuralink Announce... Nope Nope Nope nope Nope NOPE nope No.:

As a journalist, I'm supposed to approach news stories with an unbiased attitude. Just the facts, ma'am. But sometimes, that's not possible. When it comes to Elon Musk and Neuralink's desire to implant tech in our heads, I can only say NOPE. HECK NO. But hey, human trials are just six months away.

I will try, however, to get into the facts of the story with some seriousness. Neuralink, if you're unfamiliar, is one of Elon Musk's many companies. And in some ways, you could almost view it as a crossroads between those companies. If Tesla (his EV company) is a technology that we get into, and Twitter (his social media company) is a technology that broadcasts our thoughts, then Neuralink is a technology that gets into us and broadcasts our thoughts.

No seriously. The idea here is that Neuralink will implant an interface device into your skull—and into your brain—that can wirelessly connect to computers. You could then think at a computer to type out messages.

To start with, the company already mentioned releasing an iOS app that could Bluetooth connect to the "Link" device in your head to allow you "wireless" and "hands-free" control. Presumably, you'd be holding the phone while not using your fingers to type on it, so you could see that it worked correctly. That might be a boon to someone with disabilities that prevent the usual method of typing messages, but then again, other options already exist and don't require brain surgery.

At an event last night, Musk showed off the devices implanted in monkeys. The monkeys typed out phrases on a computer without using their hands or fingers. Now, to be clear, the monkeys didn't know what they were typing and didn't think the phrases themselves. Instead, they moved around a cursor to click on highlighted letters and words—they were guided to the phrase. But still, as Musk put it, they "telepathically" moved the cursor.

The company also showed that the monkey had already trained to sit under wireless chargers to charge the Link devices. Because that's right, now your head needs wireless charging too. Every night you'd put your watch on its wireless charger, your phone on its wireless charger, and your head in its wireless charger. That sounds amazing.

Getting the Link installed involves robotic surgery to remove a piece of your skull and insert 64 "hair-thin" threads into your brain. The LINK device, which resembles a stack of coins, would sit flush with your skull. Or, as Musk put it, "it's like replacing a piece of your skull with a smartwatch, for lack of a better analogy."

However, there have been many reports of animal cruelty levelled against Neuralink, including claims or high animal mortality rates, including:

So is this justified in the name of science, or is it something that for the time being we just don't need to do?


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Monday December 05, @04:31PM (1 child)

    by Freeman (732) on Monday December 05, @04:31PM (#1281280) Journal

    I might have tended to agree with you at some point. That point is not now.

    I know a doctor who is part of a practice that went from one set of owners to another.

    The doctor wasn't notified when one of their patients was moved from one status to another. The insurance provider which is the new owner of the practice decided it would be best and just did it. The patient was unaware of what it meant and the only reason the doctor knew about it was that they noticed something odd.

    Insurance providers are not your friends, they are the hostile entity that want to spend as little money on you as possible. Which means keeping you out of the hospital. That seems like a laudable goal. Except that they use every trick to keep you out of the Hospital. As opposed to helping you get, for instance, life saving treatments that would cost them a very large amount of money. There's an even bigger conflict of interest when it comes to insurance companies making decisions for you, about your health.

    Now, the two groups, doctors, and insurance companies may not always have your best interest in mind. The biggest difference I see is that it's much easier to change who your doctor is, than it is to change who your insurance provider is. It's also much easier to sue a doctor than it is to sue a major corporation (most insurance companies).

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday December 05, @10:40PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 05, @10:40PM (#1281336) Journal

    Insurance providers are not your friends, they are the hostile entity that want to spend as little money on you as possible.

    And doctors are hostile entities that want to spend as much money on you as possible. And you're a hostile entity who wants to stay as healthy as possible. In other words, welcome to conflict of interest. Everybody has them.

    Now, the two groups, doctors, and insurance companies may not always have your best interest in mind. The biggest difference I see is that it's much easier to change who your doctor is, than it is to change who your insurance provider is. It's also much easier to sue a doctor than it is to sue a major corporation (most insurance companies).

    I don't see that ease of change, but I allow that suing a major corporation is harder than seeing a doctor. It's also more profitable especially if you can get a class action going. They never just do it once.