Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Tuesday December 13, @10:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-always-said-my-Fender-stack-was-cool dept.

A prototype heat pump that uses water and sound to cool is three times as efficient as previous comparable designs:

Heat pumps cool buildings by removing heat from the inside and pushing it outside, like a refrigerator. But unlike a refrigerator, they can also heat an enclosed area by reversing the process. To top it off, heat pumps are typically more efficient than conventional heating and cooling devices.

[...] The team's thermoacoustic heat pump consists of a metal tube filled with nitrogen connected on one end to a loudspeaker that plays a sound roughly a hundred times more powerful than the noise from a chainsaw. The sound waves cause the nitrogen to compress and expand. When the gas is allowed to expand toward the loudspeaker end of the tube, it gets cool, much like how perfume sprayed from a mister cools as it dissipates.

"Inside of the tube it's as loud as rock and roll. Outside, it is dead silent," says Ramon.

Other thermostatic heat pumps work similarly, but the new one also uses water via a stack of wet paper strips placed at the other end of the tube. When the nitrogen condenses and expands, it evaporates some of this water and the turns it into vapour. This process releases energy and cools the gas further.

The whole process can also be run in reverse to generate heat rather than remove it.

[...] Simone Hochgreb at the University of Cambridge, who was not involved in the project, says that this kind of thermoacoustic device is promising because it may be efficient enough to run entirely off solar power. However, there is a trade-off. One benefit of thermoacoustic devices is that they are relatively simple to assemble because the only moving part is a loudspeaker. Adding the stack of wet strips makes the pump more efficient but also more complicated to manufacture, she says.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by istartedi on Tuesday December 13, @11:31PM

    by istartedi (123) on Tuesday December 13, @11:31PM (#1282317) Journal

    3X some number, but how does it compare to current practical heat pump technology? Not having to use the other refrigerant chemicals would be an advantage that would make some loss of efficiency acceptable; but we can't judge any of this because they've left out that key number. I guess we're expected to know what X is based on our experience with thermoacoustic heat pumps... but we don't have it. A good journalist would have dug in and got that number for us.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3