SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the sounds-like-someone-has-their-priorities-mixed-up dept.
Finnish Parliament reminds us that copyright should not trump fundamental human rights:
One of the key dogmas the copyright industry fights hard to impose on the world is that copyright should trump all other considerations, and in all situations. For its supporters, copyright should even be placed above basic human rights, if ever a clash arises between them. For the most part, legislators and judges have allowed this distorted viewpoint to be spread unchallenged, as Walled Culture noted with regret in November last year. That fact makes the following news from Finland, reported by Benjamin White on the site of the Association of European Research Libraries (LIBER), important:
In October 2022 we witnessed a significant development in Finland, with the Parliament's Constitutional Law Committee concluding that the government's draft implementation of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive is not in line with the Finnish constitution. In particular, the Committee found that it conflicted with human rights – namely the right to education and science under Section 16 of the Finnish Constitution.
White points out:
Academic commentators have long argued that copyright, and indeed other intellectual property rights, risk undermining fundamental rights in their application. Given the obligation on governments to make careful judgements in situations of legal conflict, fundamental rights undoubtedly provide a clear reason for limiting the scope of IP rights.
[...] The Finnish move is of particular interest for the following reason:
Until developments in the autumn of this year in the Finnish Parliament, we have been unaware of the fundamental human right to education and science being used in practice by European legislators to challenge the broadening scope of exclusive rights under copyright law.
We need other legislators and lawyers to follow the Finnish example and recognise that fundamental and universal rights matter more than the supposed sanctity of copyright, which only benefits corporations and a tiny number of "star" creators.
(Score: 4, Informative) by RamiK on Sunday January 22 2023, @10:24AM (3 children)
It's from the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights:
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; Title II - Freedoms; Article 14 - Right to education [europa.eu]
The UN has a narrower right that doesn't conflict with IP and, to my knowledge, isn't legally binding:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Article 26 [un.org]
The U.S. Constitution doesn't mention a right to education.
compiling...
(Score: 2) by canopic jug on Sunday January 22 2023, @12:32PM
The U.S. Constitution doesn't mention a right to education.
That's generally considered to be covered by the 14th Amendment [concordlawschool.edu], though that consideration is due more to a common way of interpretation [cornell.edu] than anything explicitly in the text.
Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday January 22 2023, @02:37PM
Oh, but if copyright is weakened in educational materials, think of the impacts to those poor outdated school textbooks - they will only get worse, and the decision makers in the school boards might miss out on their annual trips to Cancun sponsored by the book companies.... How sad...
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 3, Funny) by crafoo on Sunday January 22 2023, @04:47PM
Gross. Absolutely inhuman, foul, and disgusting.