Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday January 24 2023, @08:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the light-harvest-year dept.

Different Light Spectra Serve Different Needs for Agrivoltaics:

People are increasingly trying to grow both food and clean energy on the same land to help meet the challenges of climate change, drought and a growing global population that just topped 8 billion. This effort includes agrivoltaics, in which crops are grown under the shade of solar panels, ideally with less water.

Now scientists from the University of California, Davis, are investigating how to better harvest the sun — and its optimal light spectrum — to make agrivoltaic systems more efficient in arid agricultural regions like California.

Their study, published in Earth's Future, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, found that the red part of the light spectrum is more efficient for growing plants, while the blue part of the spectrum is better used for solar production.

[...] "Today's solar panels take all the light and try to make the best of it. But what if a new generation of photovoltaics could take the blue light for clean energy and pass the red light onto the crops, where it is most efficient for photosynthesis?"

[...] "We cannot feed 2 billion more people in 30 years by being just a little more water-efficient and continuing as we do," Abou Najm said. "We need something transformative, not incremental. If we treat the sun as a resource, we can work with shade and generate electricity while producing crops underneath. Kilowatt hours become a secondary crop you can harvest."

Journal Reference:
Matteo Camporese, Majdi Abou Najm, Not All Light Spectra Were Created Equal: Can We Harvest Light for Optimum Food-Energy Co-Generation? [open], Earth's Future, 10, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002900


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Tuesday January 24 2023, @03:06PM (6 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 24 2023, @03:06PM (#1288371) Journal
    Only if you believe that these researchers are right about the present fragility. News flash: they aren't. They're selling a narrative to get funding.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @06:17PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @06:17PM (#1288393)

    They're selling a narrative to get funding.

    Exactly. We don't need all this frail "high tech" nonsense. We can easily feed a lot more than 2 billion people by just reducing waste and corruption. Grains rot in silos while speculators hold out for a higher price, more than half of what we produce is tossed into landfills and the ditch [gannett-cdn.com], also as a means of price supports. People are starving because of state/corp piracy.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @07:01PM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @07:01PM (#1288401)

      They aren't selling a narrative, they're selling what we need to do to deal with the status quo. They're talking about how to deal with the system the way it is. If you don't like that angle, then fix the stuff you're complaining about, like tax or punish the speculators for letting the grain rot, but we can't because "socialism" or something like that.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @07:19PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @07:19PM (#1288406)

        they're selling what we need to do to deal with the status quo

        No, they're selling a "monorail" [youtu.be]

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @07:45PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @07:45PM (#1288412)

        I think if we could eliminate, say, 95% of the population - just like the Illuminati want - we will finally have the correct amount of humans.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @09:10PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @09:10PM (#1288425)

          Maybe the Illumunati are the redneck hicks we imagine them to be. Maybe their devious plan to reduce the population is finally coming together...?

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday January 24 2023, @10:41PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 24 2023, @10:41PM (#1288443) Journal

        They aren't selling a narrative, they're selling what we need to do to deal with the status quo. They're talking about how to deal with the system the way it is.

        Nonsense. The grandparent noted that we could cover the 25% increase merely by wasting less food. We can also just grow more with present day technology. This vanishes the alleged need for exotic schemes and technologies.

        And it's a terrible idea to try to force greater efficiency with regulation. You run hard into the "if I will be punished every time I make a mistake, then I just won't do that."