Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday January 24 2023, @11:40AM   Printer-friendly

Massachusetts officials have reported two cases of gonorrhea that are resistant or less susceptible to all known antibiotics used to treat it:

Super gonorrhea has infected people in the United States for the first known time. This week, Massachusetts public health officials announced the discovery of two gonorrhea cases appearing to display increased resistance to all known antibiotic classes that can be used against it. These cases were thankfully still curable, but it's the latest reminder that this common sexually transmitted infection is becoming a more serious threat.

Gonorrhea, caused by the namesake bacteria Neisseria gonorrhoeae, is the second most commonly reported STI in the U.S., with 677,769 cases documented in 2020. Many infected people don't experience illness, but initial symptoms can include a discolored discharge from the genitals, painful or burning urination, and rectal bleeding if caught from anal sex. When gonorrhea is left untreated, it raises the risk of more serious complications, like damage to the reproductive tract in women and swollen testicles in men, both of which can lead to infertility. And when it's passed down from mother to child, the infection can be fatal or cause blindness in newborns.

[...] These cases are likely only a warning of what's to come. Some of the important genetic markers seen in this novel strain have been spotted in pan-resistant cases from Europe and Asia, which shows that these mutations are continuing to spread around the world. Gonorrhea rates in general have increased year after year in the U.S. And perhaps most worryingly, no clear connection between the two Massachusetts cases has been found, indicating that these strains may already be circulating past the point where they could be easily contained.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Opportunist on Tuesday January 24 2023, @02:40PM (5 children)

    by Opportunist (5545) on Tuesday January 24 2023, @02:40PM (#1288362)

    Or just use condoms, how about that?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Flamebait=1, Troll=2, Insightful=3, Underrated=1, Touché=1, Total=8
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @03:44PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @03:44PM (#1288373)

    No thanks. I prefer not to have sex with disease-ridden people.

    • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Opportunist on Tuesday January 24 2023, @06:16PM (2 children)

      by Opportunist (5545) on Tuesday January 24 2023, @06:16PM (#1288392)

      Ya know, it's a bit like why you wear those masks when riding the bus: You don't really see it at first glance whether they're infectious. If you could instantly spot a disease on someone, the flu would have died out before recorded time because somewhere between inventing fire and cave painting, Homo Erectus would have figured out to club the sneezer to death.

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @10:15PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @10:15PM (#1288438)

        Do you really fuck people as casually as sitting near someone on the bus?!? I guess if I behaved so recklessly I'd be more concerned about picking up diseases.

        And, I don't wear masks (since I'm not concerned with virtue signalling), and I don't ride on buses (since I'm not a loser).

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @10:19PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 24 2023, @10:19PM (#1288439)

        Regarding wearing masks... you should really read the warning label on the box of masks. It clearly states that the mask doesn't protect against COVID-13.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2023, @04:15AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 25 2023, @04:15AM (#1288484)

      You don't mean all the liberals, do you?