El Reg reports
Apple has prevailed in an almost decade-long antitrust legal battle over the way its iPod gadgets handled music not obtained through iTunes.
A federal jury in Oakland, California, took just four hours to clear the iThings maker of wrongdoing--and tossed out calls for a $351[M] compensation package for eight million owners of late-2000s iPods. That figure could have been tripled if the iPhone giant had lost its fight.
Apple was accused in a class-action lawsuit of designing its software to remove music and other files from iPods that weren't purchased or ripped via iTunes--but the eight-person jury decided that mechanism was a legit feature.
[...]It was argued that Apple had deliberately set up iTunes to report iPods as damaged if they stored music that, essentially, wasn't sanctioned by Apple: if alien files were found by the software, users were told to restore their devices to factory settings, effectively wiping songs not purchased from or ripped from CD by iTunes.
Apple countered that it was only preventing iPods from being hacked or damaged by third-party data. The company said the protections were implemented to prevent people from listening to pirated music--a claim the jury upheld.
Related:
Apple Deleted Rivals' Songs from Users' iPods - Class-Action Suit
Apple's Intentional iPod Lock-in Efforts - Engineer Testifies in Court
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Thursday December 18 2014, @05:41AM
What was the name of that character in the first "Matrix" movie, who when the court was about to unplug her ("Switch"?), said: "Not like this, not like this."
Not sure who to hate more, the RIAA with their insistence on, well, serfdom, or the Apple, with their liberation from RIAA serfdom by means of iTunes serfdom. I have never partaken of either. I am a free ancient greek, I predate your silly intellectual property laws. Heck, in my day, there was very little intelligence! But the idea that it would be minimized, controlled, only doled out to those who could pay! Heresy!