Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Thursday December 18 2014, @02:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the totally-legit-feature dept.

El Reg reports

Apple has prevailed in an almost decade-long antitrust legal battle over the way its iPod gadgets handled music not obtained through iTunes.

A federal jury in Oakland, California, took just four hours to clear the iThings maker of wrongdoing--and tossed out calls for a $351[M] compensation package for eight million owners of late-2000s iPods. That figure could have been tripled if the iPhone giant had lost its fight.

Apple was accused in a class-action lawsuit of designing its software to remove music and other files from iPods that weren't purchased or ripped via iTunes--but the eight-person jury decided that mechanism was a legit feature.

[...]It was argued that Apple had deliberately set up iTunes to report iPods as damaged if they stored music that, essentially, wasn't sanctioned by Apple: if alien files were found by the software, users were told to restore their devices to factory settings, effectively wiping songs not purchased from or ripped from CD by iTunes.

Apple countered that it was only preventing iPods from being hacked or damaged by third-party data. The company said the protections were implemented to prevent people from listening to pirated music--a claim the jury upheld.

Related:
Apple Deleted Rivals' Songs from Users' iPods - Class-Action Suit
Apple's Intentional iPod Lock-in Efforts - Engineer Testifies in Court

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Thursday December 18 2014, @02:52PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 18 2014, @02:52PM (#127155)

    The windows version is pretty rough. It's slow and leaves a bunch of services running 24/7. But like you said, that may be intentional. I have the feeling it's because iTunes requires a lot of infrastructure to function so they had to install a lot of system level libraries and services to get it working on windows. Linux seems to be a non-starter. You have to use an iTunes alternative.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by theluggage on Thursday December 18 2014, @06:29PM

    by theluggage (1797) on Thursday December 18 2014, @06:29PM (#127217)

    The windows version is pretty rough.

    That's the impression I've been forming - I think it explains a lot of the anti-iDevice sentiment. iTunes on Mac is a long way from perfect (main problem is bloat from its expansion way beyond the "tunes" thing) but its fairly good at its job.

    Linux seems to be a non-starter. You have to use an iTunes alternative.

    I'm not sure what combination of misconceptions would lead a Linux user to buy an iDevice. Open Source and DRM do not make good bedfellows... but its not like the iPod is the first or last hardware device to lack proper Linux support.
       

    • (Score: 2) by tibman on Thursday December 18 2014, @06:59PM

      by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 18 2014, @06:59PM (#127227)

      When i bought mine there were very few mp3 players on the market. The iPod was fantastic in comparison to others. This was only a few years post-napster and mp3s were still not a common way to store music. Everyone still had cd wallets in their cars. There was a lot of 3rd party ipod support for linux. It worked great as long as you did not ever use iTunes (it would delete your music).

      --
      SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.