Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Thursday December 18 2014, @02:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the totally-legit-feature dept.

El Reg reports

Apple has prevailed in an almost decade-long antitrust legal battle over the way its iPod gadgets handled music not obtained through iTunes.

A federal jury in Oakland, California, took just four hours to clear the iThings maker of wrongdoing--and tossed out calls for a $351[M] compensation package for eight million owners of late-2000s iPods. That figure could have been tripled if the iPhone giant had lost its fight.

Apple was accused in a class-action lawsuit of designing its software to remove music and other files from iPods that weren't purchased or ripped via iTunes--but the eight-person jury decided that mechanism was a legit feature.

[...]It was argued that Apple had deliberately set up iTunes to report iPods as damaged if they stored music that, essentially, wasn't sanctioned by Apple: if alien files were found by the software, users were told to restore their devices to factory settings, effectively wiping songs not purchased from or ripped from CD by iTunes.

Apple countered that it was only preventing iPods from being hacked or damaged by third-party data. The company said the protections were implemented to prevent people from listening to pirated music--a claim the jury upheld.

Related:
Apple Deleted Rivals' Songs from Users' iPods - Class-Action Suit
Apple's Intentional iPod Lock-in Efforts - Engineer Testifies in Court

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19 2014, @03:10PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19 2014, @03:10PM (#127496)

    The assumptions you base your apologia on are kind of amazing. It is a level of delusion, a slanting of half-truths to such an extreme, that the only reasonable explanation is that you have some sort of hang-up that causes you to defend such blatantly anti-customer behavior.

  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday December 19 2014, @04:11PM

    by Tork (3914) on Friday December 19 2014, @04:11PM (#127512)

    The assumptions you base your apologia on are kind of amazing.

    Lol.

    ...the only reasonable explanation is that you have some sort of hang-up that causes you to defend such blatantly anti-customer behavior.

    The hang-up that I have is that I read about it. If you had, you could have had a rebuttal instead of playing the shill card.

    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈